Expression Profiles of Protease in Onychomycosis-Related Pathogenic Trichophyton rubrum and Tinea Capitis-Related

Jingjing Chen1, Yangmin Gao2, Shuzhen Xiong1

  • 1Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, China.

Mycopathologia
|January 24, 2024
PubMed

Insights

Differences in protease gene expression between Trichophyton rubrum and Trichophyton violaceum may explain their distinct ecological niches in causing skin and scalp infections. Further research is needed.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Mycology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Biochemistry

Background:

  • Trichophyton rubrum and Trichophyton violaceum are common fungal pathogens causing human infections.
  • Both species belong to the "Trichophyton rubrum complex" and exhibit high genomic similarity, including nearly identical secreted proteinases crucial for keratin degradation.
  • Despite genetic similarities, they occupy different ecological niches: T. rubrum primarily infects skin and nails, while T. violaceum predominantly infects the scalp.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the hypothesis that differential protease gene expression contributes to the distinct ecological preferences of T. rubrum and T. violaceum.
  • To compare the expression profiles of 22 endoprotease genes (subtilisins, deuterolysins, fungalysins) in both species under varying keratin conditions.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of protease gene expression profiles for T. rubrum and T. violaceum.
  • Experimental incubation of fungi with human nail keratin, sheep wool keratin, and keratin-free media.
  • Sample collection at 12, 24, 48, and 96 hours post-incubation.
  • Quantitative comparison of protease gene expression levels between the two species and across different media.

Main Results:

  • Protease expression was generally higher in wool keratin medium compared to human nail keratin medium, with lowest expression in keratin-free media.
  • Significant differences in protease expression profiles were observed between T. rubrum and T. violaceum.
  • Specific proteases (MEP1, MEP3, SUB5, SUB11, SUB12) showed higher expression in T. rubrum, while others (MEP2, NpIIc, NpIIe, SUB1, SUB3, SUB4, SUB7, SUB8) were higher in T. violaceum.

Conclusions:

  • The observed differences in protease gene expression between T. rubrum and T. violaceum likely contribute to their distinct ecological niches and host tissue preferences.
  • These findings provide a molecular basis for understanding the pathogenesis of these common dermatophytes.
  • Further studies are warranted to validate these findings and elucidate the precise roles of specific proteases in infection.