Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2025

11:53
Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm
Published on: December 9, 2012
13.0K
Identifying value chain trade-offs from fruit and vegetable aggregation services in Bangladesh using a system
Dipok K Choudhury1,2, Gregory S Cooper3, Karl M Rich4
1Department of Agribusiness and Marketing, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh.
Plos One
|January 24, 2024
Summary
Aggregation schemes can improve fruit and vegetable (F&V) distribution to smaller markets, benefiting both consumers and smallholder farmers in Bangladesh. Combining aggregation with price growth boosts demand without compromising farmer income.
Area of Science:
- Agricultural Economics
- Supply Chain Management
- Food Systems Analysis
Background:
- Bangladesh's agricultural policy prioritizes cereals, potentially limiting fruit and vegetable (F&V) market access for smallholder farmers.
- Smallholder farmers' weak market connections hinder F&V supply, impacting availability in smaller retail markets.
- Existing aggregation schemes often favor wholesale/urban markets due to infrastructure reliance, neglecting rural areas.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the 'Loop' aggregation intervention's potential to enhance F&V distribution to smaller markets.
- To assess the impact of aggregation on farmer benefits and consumer outcomes in retail markets.
- To identify potential trade-offs between consumer access and farmer profitability.
Main Methods:
- Employed a system dynamics modeling approach to simulate Loop's aggregation services in Jashore, Bangladesh.
- Analyzed the interplay between aggregation, market quotas, transport subsidies, and price dynamics.
- Evaluated consumer purchasing patterns and farmer economic benefits under various intervention scenarios.
Main Results:
- Combining aggregation with market quotas, transport subsidies, and price growth showed no negative trade-offs between consumer purchases and farmer benefits.
- Aggregation combined with current price growth increased demand without reducing farmer benefits.
- Standalone and multiple market-oriented interventions demonstrated broader win-win outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Aggregation interventions, particularly when combined with supportive policies, can foster inclusive food systems.
- Targeted strategies can improve F&V distribution to underserved markets, enhancing both consumer access and farmer livelihoods.
- System dynamics modeling offers valuable insights for designing effective agricultural interventions.

