Effects of coronary artery disease in patients with permanent left bundle branch area pacing: A retrospective study
Yu Shan1,2, Maoning Lin1,2, Miao Ye3
1Department of Cardiology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, No 3 East of Qinchun Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310000, China.
Insights
Coronary artery disease (CAD) significantly increases the capture threshold during left bundle branch area pacing (LBBaP). Patients without CAD may experience safer LBBaP parameters, suggesting CAD is a risk factor for increased capture thresholds.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Myocardial ischemia affects traditional pacing parameters.
- The impact of coronary artery disease (CAD) on left bundle branch area pacing (LBBaP) is not well understood.
- LBBaP is a physiological pacing method.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether CAD impacts pacing parameters and electrophysiological characteristics of LBBaP.
- To determine if CAD is associated with changes in LBBaP settings.
Main Methods:
- 176 patients undergoing LBBaP were divided into CAD and Non-CAD groups based on coronary angiography.
- Pacing parameters and electrophysiological characteristics were recorded during LBBaP implantation.
- Multivariate logistic regression analyzed the association between CAD and higher capture threshold.
Main Results:
- CAD patients (n=61) had a higher capture threshold (0.82 ± 0.28 V) compared to Non-CAD patients (n=115, 0.67 ± 0.22 V).
- CAD was independently associated with a higher capture threshold (aOR 3.418).
- CAD patients exhibited lower R-wave amplitude (10.1 ± 2.7 mV vs. 12.5 ± 4.8 mV).
Conclusions:
- Patients without CAD may have safer pacing parameters during LBBaP.
- CAD appears to be a risk factor for increased capture thresholds in permanent LBBaP.
Aims:
Myocardial ischemia can affect traditional right ventricular (RV) pacing parameters, but it is unclear whether coronary artery disease (CAD) impact the pacing parameters and electrophysiological characteristics of left bundle branch area pacing (LBBaP) as a physiological pacing representative.
Methods:
Patients who underwent coronary angiography (CAG) after/before the LBBaP procedure and underwent percutaneous coronary intervention after LBBaP procedure were divided into CAD group and Non-CAD group according to visual CAG. Pacing parameters and electrophysiological characteristics were recorded at LBBaP implantation. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was implemented to evaluate the association between CAD and higher capture threshold. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to verify result stability.
Results:
A total of 176 patients met inclusion criteria (115 Non-CAD patients and 61 CAD patients) with a mean age of 71.1 ± 9.0 years. Compared with the Non-CAD patients, CAD patients had the higher capture threshold (0.67 ± 0.22 V vs. 0.82 ± 0.28 V, P < 0.001) and lower R-wave amplitude (12.5 ± 4.8 mV vs. 10.1 ± 2.7 mV, P = 0.001). Moreover, CAD was independently associated with higher capture threshold (adjusted Odds ratio (OR) 3.418, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.621-7.206, P = 0.001), which was further validated through sensitivity analyses.
Conclusion:
Patients without CAD might have safer pacing parameters in the LBBaP procedure. Besides, CAD might be the risk factor of capture threshold increase during permanent LBBaP implantation.
Related Concept Videos
Imbalances in Cardiac Output
CHF can occur due to the failure of either side of the heart. Left-side failure leads to pulmonary congestion—the right side continues to send...
Decreased pulse rate
There are specific risk factors that can elevate the likelihood of developing bradycardia. Advanced age is a significant factor, with...
Disturbances in Heart Rhythm
Arrhythmias are categorized by their speed, rhythm, and origin. A slow...
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers


