Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

No prognostic role for FIGO grading in mismatch repair deficient endometrial carcinoma.

European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)·2026
Same author

Estimation of accumulated dose to organs at risk in head and neck cancer patients treated with scheduled replanning and dose painting in the ARTFORCE trial.

Physics and imaging in radiation oncology·2026
Same author

Response to the letter to the editor by Pontoriero et al. regarding the article "Cost-utility-analysis of molecular-integrated-profile for women with (high)intermediate risk endometrial cancer - PORTEC-4a an international randomised phase 3 trial by Van den Heerik et al."

Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology·2026
Same author

Acute and long-term toxicity profiles and final oncologic outcomes in the phase III ARTFORCE trial.

Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology·2026
Same author

Preoperative radiological compression features and their relationship with pre- and postoperative visual field defects in pituitary macroadenomas: a retrospective cohort from the neuro-ophthalmological clinic.

Frontiers in ophthalmology·2026
Same author

Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation for refractory ventricular tachycardia: the STOPSTORM.eu study.

European heart journal·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 5, 2025

Medical-grade Sterilizable Target for Fluid-immersed Fetoscope Optical Distortion Calibration
07:03

Medical-grade Sterilizable Target for Fluid-immersed Fetoscope Optical Distortion Calibration

Published on: February 23, 2017

7.7K

Correction Method for Optical Scaling of Fundoscopy Images: Development, Validation, and First Implementation.

Lennart J Pors1,2,3, Corné Haasjes1,2,4,5, Luc van Vught2,4,6

  • 1Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
|January 25, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Accurate measurements in fundus photography are challenging due to individual eye anatomy. The new PARaxial Optical fundus Scaling (PAROS) method corrects for these variations, improving quantitative analysis in ophthalmology.

More Related Videos

Using Retinal Imaging to Study Dementia
09:17

Using Retinal Imaging to Study Dementia

Published on: November 6, 2017

21.6K
Quantitative Fundus Autofluorescence for the Evaluation of Retinal Diseases
07:22

Quantitative Fundus Autofluorescence for the Evaluation of Retinal Diseases

Published on: March 11, 2016

11.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 5, 2025

Medical-grade Sterilizable Target for Fluid-immersed Fetoscope Optical Distortion Calibration
07:03

Medical-grade Sterilizable Target for Fluid-immersed Fetoscope Optical Distortion Calibration

Published on: February 23, 2017

7.7K
Using Retinal Imaging to Study Dementia
09:17

Using Retinal Imaging to Study Dementia

Published on: November 6, 2017

21.6K
Quantitative Fundus Autofluorescence for the Evaluation of Retinal Diseases
07:22

Quantitative Fundus Autofluorescence for the Evaluation of Retinal Diseases

Published on: March 11, 2016

11.5K

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Optical Engineering
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Fundus photography is vital in ophthalmology but scaling variations due to ocular anatomy limit accurate distance measurements.
  • Existing methods do not fully account for individual refractive differences, leading to potential inaccuracies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and validate the PARaxial Optical fundus Scaling (PAROS) method for correcting magnification variations in fundus images.
  • To enable more accurate quantitative assessments in ophthalmology by addressing individual ocular anatomy differences.

Main Methods:

  • Modeled eye and fundus camera optics using ray transfer matrix formalism.
  • Personalized ocular geometry using biometry, refractive, and keratometry data.
  • Validated the PAROS method with eye phantoms and evaluated it in human subjects (healthy, pIOL, pseudophakic, uveal melanoma patients).

Main Results:

  • PAROS method showed minimal differences (max 3.3%) between model and actual image magnification.
  • Observed significant fundus magnification variations (0.79 to 1.48) relative to the average eye.
  • Spherical equivalent of refraction (RSE) strongly influenced magnification, with differences up to 40% compared to the Bennett-Littmann method.

Conclusions:

  • The PAROS method accurately accounts for individual scaling differences in fundus images.
  • This improved accuracy enables more reliable quantitative analysis in fundus photography.
  • PAROS offers a significant advancement over existing methods for precise ophthalmic imaging analysis.