Early versus late administration of amino acids in preterm infants receiving parenteral nutrition
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2025

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Amit Trivedi1,2, Vishal Jatana3, John Kh Sinn4
1Grace Centre for Newborn Intensive Care, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, Australia.
Insights
Early administration of amino acids (AA) in preterm newborns shows little effect on growth and neurodevelopment. While it increases positive nitrogen balance, its clinical significance remains unclear, necessitating further research.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal nutrition and intensive care
- Parenteral nutrition in preterm infants
- Growth and developmental outcomes in neonates
Background:
- Delayed administration of amino acids (AA) in preterm newborns may lead to a protein catabolic state, potentially affecting growth and development.
- The optimal timing for initiating intravenous AA in neonates born before 37 weeks of gestation is a critical clinical question.
Approach:
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing early (<24 hours) versus late (>24 hours) administration of intravenous AA.
- Searched multiple databases (CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase) and trial registries up to March 2023.
- Assessed the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach.
Key Points:
- Nine RCTs involving 383 preterm infants were included.
- Early AA administration showed little to no effect on length and head circumference in the first month.
- Neurodevelopmental outcomes (Mental Developmental Index < 70) at two years also showed no significant difference.
- A significant increase in positive nitrogen balance was observed within the first three days with early AA administration.
Conclusions:
- Current low-certainty evidence suggests no significant difference in growth or neurodevelopment between early and late AA administration in preterm infants.
- No studies reported on weight changes in the first month, discharge weight, or all-cause mortality.
- Larger, adequately powered RCTs are needed to definitively establish the optimal timing for AA initiation in preterm neonates.
Background:
Observational studies in preterm newborns suggest that delay in administering amino acids (AA) could result in a protein catabolic state and impact on growth and development.
Objectives:
The objective of this review was to compare the efficacy and safety of early versus late administration of intravenous AA in neonates born at < 37 weeks of gestation.
Search Methods:
We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and trial registries in March 2023. We checked the reference lists of included studies and studies/systematic reviews where subject matter related to the intervention or population examined in this review.
Selection Criteria:
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing early administration of AA with late administration in premature newborn infants. We defined early administration of AA solution as the administration of AA in isolation or with total parenteral nutrition within the first 24 hours of birth, and late administration as the administration of AA in isolation or with total parenteral nutrition after the first 24 hours of birth.
Data Collection And Analysis:
We used standard Cochrane methodological procedures. We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of the evidence.
Main Results:
Nine studies (383 participants) were eligible for inclusion in the review. All study participants were born at < 37 weeks of gestation and were inpatients in neonatal intensive care units. No studies reported growth during the first months of life as assessed by difference in weight. Early administration of AA may have little or no effect on growth in the first month of life as measured by length (mean difference (MD) 0.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.41 to 0.41; 1 study; 21 participants; low-certainty evidence) and head circumference (MD 0.05, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.14; 2 studies; 87 participants; low-certainty evidence). No studies reported the discharge weight outcome. Early administration of AA may result in little to no difference in neurodevelopmental outcome assessed by Mental Developmental Index (MDI) of < 70 at two years of age (odds ratio 0.83, 95% CI 0.21 to 3.28; 1 study; 111 participants; low-certainty evidence). No studies reported all-cause mortality at 28 days and before discharge. Early administration of AA may result in a large increase in positive nitrogen balance in the first three days of life (MD 250.42, 95% CI 224.91 to 275.93; 4 studies; 93 participants; low-certainty evidence).
Authors' Conclusions:
Low-certainty evidence suggests that there may be little to no difference between early and late administration of AA in growth (measured by length and head circumference during the first month after birth) and neurodevelopmental outcome (assessed by MDI of < 70). No RCTs reported on weight in the first month of life, mortality (all-cause mortality at 28 days and before discharge), or discharge weight. Low-certainty evidence suggests a large increase in positive nitrogen balance in preterm infants who received AA within 24 hours of birth. The clinical relevance of this observation is unknown. The number of infants in the RCTs included in the review was small, and there was clinical heterogeneity amongst trials. Adequately powered trials in infants < 37 weeks' gestation are required to determine optimal timing of initiation of AA. We identified two ongoing studies. Both studies will be recruiting infants ≥ 34 weeks of gestation and may or may not add to the outcome data for this review.
More Related Videos
09:36Effect of Hyaluronic Acid 35 kDa on an In Vitro Model of Preterm Small Intestinal Injury and Healing Using Enteroid-Derived Monolayers
Published on: July 28, 2022
07:36Modeling Encephalopathy of Prematurity Using Prenatal Hypoxia-ischemia with Intra-amniotic Lipopolysaccharide in Rats
Published on: November 20, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Parentral Nutrition: Centeral and Peripheral Parental Nutrition
PN can be administered through two primary routes:
1. Central Parenteral Nutrition (CPN):
CPN involves delivering a high concentration of nutrients through a large vein. This is typically achieved using a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) or,...
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube...
Routes of Drug Administration: Parenteral
The intravenous route (IV) of drug administration can be further categorized into two types. The bolus injection administers the entire dose rapidly, while an intravenous infusion slowly delivers smaller doses steadily.
The IV route is often...
Factors Affecting Drug Response: Overview
Drug Delivery: Parenteral Route
There are three primary parenteral routes: intravenous (IV), intramuscular (IM), and subcutaneous (SC). The IV route introduces the drug directly into the bloodstream, ensuring immediate action. The IM route...
Enteral Nutrition I: Orogastric and Nasogastric Feeding
Orogastric (OG) and nasogastric (NG) feeding are two standard methods used for enteral nutrition. Enteral nutrition is often preferred over...