Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2025

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
Published on: September 27, 2019
The SAFE Model: State Authenticity as a Function of Three Types of Fit
Audrey Aday1, Yingchi Guo1, Smriti Mehta2
1The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
None:
The SAFE model asserts that state authenticity stems from three types of fit to the environment. Across two studies of university students, we validated instruments measuring self-concept, goal, and social fit as unique predictors of state authenticity. In Study 1 (N = 969), relationships between fit and state authenticity were robust to controlling for conceptually similar and distinct variables. Using experience sampling methodology, Study 2 (N = 269) provided evidence that fit and authenticity co-vary at the state (i.e., within-person) level, controlling for between-person effects. Momentary variation in each fit type predicted greater state authenticity, willingness to return to the situation, and state attachment to one's university. Each fit type was also predicted by distinct contextual features (e.g., location, activity, company). Supporting a theorized link to cognitive fluency, situations eliciting self-concept fit elicited higher working memory capacity and lower emotional burnout. We discuss the implications of fit in educational contexts.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Reliability and Validity
Goodness-of-Fit Test
Self-Schemas
Marcia's Theory of Identity Status
Social Proof

