Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Two sample Mendelian Randomisation using an outcome from a multilevel model of disease progression.
Michael Lawton1, Yoav Ben-Shlomo2, Apostolos Gkatzionis2,3
1Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. Michael.Lawton@bristol.ac.uk.
This study introduces a multivariate approach to Mendelian randomization for analyzing disease progression trajectories. The method showed similar performance to univariate approaches but offers better joint coverage for disease severity and progression rate.
Area of Science:
- Epidemiology
- Genetics
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Identifying causal factors for disease progression, particularly in neurodegenerative diseases, is crucial.
- Disease progression is often modeled as a linear trajectory with an intercept (initial severity) and slope (rate of change).
- Two-sample Mendelian randomization (2SMR) is a method to infer causal relationships from observational data, mitigating confounding bias.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and evaluate a multivariate two-sample Mendelian randomization (2SMR) approach for analyzing disease progression.
- To estimate the causal effect of an exposure on both the intercept and slope of a linear disease progression trajectory.
- To compare the performance of the multivariate 2SMR approach against a univariate 2SMR method.
Main Methods:
- A multivariate 2SMR method was developed using a multilevel model for disease progression.
- A simulation study was conducted comparing the multivariate 2SMR approach with a univariate 2SMR approach.
- The simulation involved scenarios where an exposure affected both the intercept and slope of a linearly progressing outcome.
- The methods were applied to two Parkinson's disease cohorts to assess the effect of body mass index (BMI) on disease progression.
Main Results:
- Simulation results indicated that both univariate and multivariate 2SMR approaches showed no significant evidence against non-zero bias.
- Confidence interval coverage for intercept (93.4-96.2%) and slope (94.5-96.0%) was appropriate in simulations.
- The multivariate approach provided better joint coverage for both intercept and slope effects.
- Analysis of Parkinson's cohorts found no strong evidence that BMI causally affects disease progression, though confidence intervals were wide.
Conclusions:
- The developed multivariate 2SMR approach is a viable method for estimating causal effects on disease progression trajectories.
- While simulation results were comparable to univariate methods, the multivariate approach offers improved joint estimation of progression parameters.
- Further research with larger cohorts is needed to confirm the effect of BMI on Parkinson's disease progression due to wide confidence intervals.
Related Concept Videos
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
The Mantel-Cox Log-Rank Test
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Mismatch Repair
The Mutator Protein Family Plays a Key Role in DNA Mismatch Repair
The human genome has more than 3 billion base pairs of DNA per cell. Prior to cell division, that vast amount of genetic...

