Echocardiographic estimation of left ventricular filling pressures in heart transplant recipients

Zohreh Rahbar1, Anahita Tavoosi1, Alireza Bakhshandeh2

  • 1Department of Cardiology, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, End of Keshavarz Boulevard, Tehran, 1419733141, Iran.

Insights

Echocardiography can estimate left ventricular filling pressure in heart transplant recipients. However, average E/e' ≥ 6.8 is the best cutoff for predicting elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP).

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Transplant Medicine
  • Echocardiography

Background:

  • Echocardiographic estimation of left ventricular filling pressure in heart transplant (HTx) recipients presents significant challenges.
  • Accurate assessment of elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) is crucial for post-transplant management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the capability of echocardiography in detecting elevated LVEDP in HTx patients.
  • To evaluate the correlation between echocardiographic parameters and invasive LVEDP measurements.

Main Methods:

  • A descriptive cross-sectional study involving 39 HTx recipients undergoing routine endomyocardial biopsy.
  • Doppler transthoracic echocardiography performed prior to biopsy, with simultaneous left heart catheterization.
  • Analysis of parameters including lateral E/e', average E/e', and left ventricular global longitudinal strain against LVEDP.

Main Results:

  • Strong correlations were observed between lateral E/e' and LVEDP (R=0.64, P<0.001) and average E/e' and LVEDP (R=0.6, P<0.001).
  • The optimal cutoff for average E/e' to predict LVEDP ≥ 20 mmHg was ≥ 6.8, with 96.15% sensitivity and 68.5% specificity.
  • A significant relationship was also found between LVEDP and left ventricular global longitudinal strain (R=-0.31, P<0.01).

Conclusions:

  • Lateral E/e' demonstrated the strongest predictive capability for LVEDP, with average E/e' cutoff showing the best validity.
  • Despite strong associations, echocardiographic parameters are not a complete surrogate for invasive LVEDP measurements in HTx recipients.
  • Further research may refine echocardiographic models for LVEDP estimation in this population.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos