Health economics for intra-capsular hip fractures undertaking fixation

Anatole Wiik1, Thomas Ashdown2, Ian Holloway2

  • 1Department of Surgery, Trauma and Orthopaedics, London North West University Healthcare, London HA1 3UJ, United Kingdom. wiikav@hotmail.com.

PubMed

Insights

This study found no significant difference between two hip fracture fixation methods. Displaced fractures and older age predicted poor outcomes, suggesting arthroplasty may be a better option for some patients.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Geriatric Medicine
  • Musculoskeletal Injury

Background:

  • Hip fractures are a common injury in the elderly, often requiring surgical intervention.
  • Intra-capsular hip fractures are typically managed with arthroplasty or fixation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the effectiveness of two common fixation methods for intra-capsular hip fractures.
  • To identify factors influencing outcomes in surgically treated hip fractures.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective audit of 83 patients with intra-capsular hip fractures treated between 2012-2018.
  • Evaluation of patient records for clinical outcomes, cost-benefit analysis, and quality of life measures (EQ-5D, VAS) at least one year post-surgery.
  • Comparison of outcomes between cannulated cancellous screws and sliding hip screws.

Main Results:

  • No significant differences were observed in blood loss, tip-apex distance, radiation exposure, length of stay, or union time between the two fixation methods.
  • Displaced intra-capsular hip fractures were significantly associated with poorer outcomes (OR 7.25).
  • Re-operation rates were 19% for cannulated screws and 11% for sliding hip screws, with no significant difference in health resource group tariffs or implant costs.

Conclusions:

  • Neither fixation method demonstrated a significant advantage for intra-capsular hip fractures.
  • Initial fracture displacement and patient age were key predictors of re-operation.
  • Arthroplasty should be carefully considered for its potential health economic and patient benefit advantages.
Abstract