Model for end-stage liver disease-3.0 vs. model for end-stage liver disease-sodium: mortality prediction in Korea

Jeong Han Kim1,2, Yong Joon Cho1, Won Hyeok Choe1

  • 1Department of Internal Medicine, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

Insights

The updated Model for End-Stage Liver Disease 3.0 (MELD-3.0) shows improved accuracy in predicting short-term mortality for Korean liver cirrhosis patients compared to MELD-Na. This finding aids in better patient prioritization for liver transplantation.

Area of Science:

  • Hepatology
  • Medical Statistics
  • Clinical Prediction Models

Background:

  • The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) is crucial for assessing short-term mortality in liver cirrhosis (LC) patients and prioritizing liver transplantation.
  • MELD-3.0, an updated version introduced in 2021, aims to enhance the predictive accuracy of the original MELD score.
  • Comparing MELD-3.0 with MELD-Na is essential to evaluate its improved efficacy in diverse patient populations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the predictive performance of MELD-3.0 against MELD-Na for short-term mortality in Korean patients with liver cirrhosis.
  • To assess the accuracy of both MELD scores in predicting 3-month and 6-month mortality rates.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective analysis of 3,034 liver cirrhosis patients admitted to Konkuk University Hospital between 2011 and 2021.
  • Calculation of MELD-Na and MELD-3.0 scores for all patients.
  • Utilized the area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) to evaluate predictive values for 3- and 6-month mortality, with the DeLong test for statistical comparison.

Main Results:

  • A total of 339 (11.2%) and 421 (14.4%) patients died within 3 and 6 months, respectively.
  • MELD-3.0 demonstrated superior predictive ability over MELD-Na for both 3-month (AUROC 0.851 vs. 0.846) and 6-month mortality (AUROC 0.848 vs. 0.843).
  • The differences in AUROC values were statistically significant for both 3-month (p=0.03) and 6-month mortality (p=0.01).

Conclusions:

  • MELD-3.0 shows a statistically significant improvement in predicting mortality for Korean liver cirrhosis patients compared to MELD-Na.
  • The findings support the enhanced utility of MELD-3.0 in clinical practice for managing liver cirrhosis and guiding transplantation decisions.

Related Concept Videos

Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion01:26

Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion

Physiological and compartmental models are valuable tools used in studying biological systems. These models rely on differential equations to maintain mass balance within the system, ensuring an accurate representation of the dynamic processes at play.
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Pathophysiologic Assessment and Liver Function Test01:22

Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Pathophysiologic Assessment and Liver Function Test

In clinical practice, the direct measurement of hepatic blood flow to evaluate liver function presents significant challenges due to the intricate and specialized nature of the necessary techniques. Consequently, healthcare professionals often rely on empirical estimates derived from thorough patient examinations and liver function tests to gauge liver health. Among the tools at their disposal, the Child–Pugh and MELD scoring systems stand out for their ability to categorize and assess the...
Drug Dosing in Renal Diseases: Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate Based on Serum Creatinine Concentration01:28

Drug Dosing in Renal Diseases: Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate Based on Serum Creatinine Concentration

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) can be estimated from serum creatinine using the modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) formula or the chronic kidney disease–epidemiology collaboration (CKD–EPI) equation. Both methods are widely used in clinical practice to assess kidney function and guide treatment decisions.The MDRD equation does not require weight or height measurements and is normalized to the body surface area of 1.73 m², considered the average adult surface area. This equation is...