Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026
Continuous Telemetric In Utero Tracheal Pressure Measurements in Fetal Lambs
Published on: December 22, 2023
[TERMINATION OF PREGNANCY DUE TO FETAL ABNORMALITIES PERFORMED AFTER 24 WEEKS OF GESTATION: THE EXPERIENCE OF THE
Yael Berman1, Marina Pekar-Zlotin1, Yaakov Melcer1
1Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, "Shamir" ("Assaf Harofeh") Medical Center, Tzrifin, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University.
Background:
Termination of pregnancy is a difficult moral dilemma that provokes a discussion in the public, from an ethical, moral and religious point of view. This process is complex, especially when it comes to a fetus at a viability age (late abortion, after week 24), which requires the approval of a regional supreme committee.
Objectives:
To examine the various causes of abortion both before and after the fetal viability age (24 weeks of gestation and beyond) in a singleton pregnancy, as well as to examine the sequence of events that led to a late abortion.
Methods:
In this cohort study, 4,057 patients who had abortions due to fetal abnormalities in the Shamir Medical Center during the years 1998-2021, were divided according to the abortion indications. Of these, 3539 (91.28%) had early abortion (24 weeks and below) and 338 (8.72%) had late abortions (24 week and later).
Results:
In general, the leading reasons for abortions are chromosomal and genetic (1862 [46%]) as well as anatomical indication (1868 [46%]). It was found that the leading indication for early abortion is the chromosomal or genetic abnormalities (1702 [48.1%]), while the leading indication for late abortion is anatomical defects (204 [60.4%]) (p=0.000). In late abortion, the leading anatomical cause is heart defects (62 [30.54%]) followed by central nervous system defects (56 [26.6%]), and the leading chromosomal cause is trisomy 21 (Down syndrome) (23 [22.33%]). When examining the sequence of events that led to late abortion, the leading reason is abnormal findings that required further studies (125 [37%]).
Conclusions:
There is great importance in trying to reduce late pregnancy abortion by understanding the sequence of events and the reasons that led to it. Changing the processes that need to be performed can be implemented by combining pathways: improving the technological means, using more accurate instrumentation and advanced molecular genetics. Furthermore, it is essential to raise the awareness of the pregnant women on screening tests, and conducting this as early as possible. Additionally, it is important to raise the skill of the operators. We believe that incorporating all those actions will lead to earlier diagnosis and to a decrease in late abortions, a promising message both from the point of view of the women and the medical staff, due to the difficulty in carrying out late pregnancy terminations.
