Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Scientific Method in Nursing Process01:18

The Scientific Method in Nursing Process

10.4K
The scientific method provides the foundation for any research. It is the most reliable and objective of all forms of gaining knowledge and guides in applying research-based evidence in practice and conducting future research.
When using research findings to change practice, one must understand the process used to guide a study. The scientific method is a systematic, step-by-step process that supports the data's validity, reliability, and generalizability. As a result, findings can be...
10.4K
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

6.9K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
6.9K
Blind Procedures02:07

Blind Procedures

10.6K
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which...
10.6K
Study Design in Statistics01:15

Study Design in Statistics

8.1K
A study design is a set of techniques that allow a researcher to collect and analyze data from different variables defined for a specific research problem. Statistics is commonly for effective study design and more robust experiments,
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
8.1K
Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

6.7K
Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
6.7K
Surveys02:16

Surveys

14.8K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
14.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Efficacy and safety of clipping prior to cyanoacrylate embolization in gastric varices: a single-arm systematic review and meta-analysis.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same author

Inferior Vena Cava Ultrasound for Decongestion Assessment in Acute Heart Failure: Systematic Review.

Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

Endoscopic Versus Microscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery in the Treatment of Pituitary Adenoma: A Systematic Review.

Cureus·2026
Same author

Early gastrointestinal manifestations predict disease progression and mortality in patients with systemic sclerosis.

Rheumatology (Oxford, England)·2026
Same author

Subcutaneous Sweet Syndrome as an uncommon mucocutaneous manifestation in systemic lupus erythematosus: a case report and literature review.

Immunologic research·2026
Same author

Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion Versus Multiple Daily Injections for Glycemic Control in Pediatric Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis.

AACE endocrinology and diabetes·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 4, 2025

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

526

Ten Steps to Conduct a Systematic Review.

Ernesto Calderon Martinez1, Jose R Flores Valdés2, Jaqueline L Castillo2

  • 1Digital Health, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de Mexico, MEX.

Cureus
|February 1, 2024
PubMed
Summary

This guide offers a 10-step framework for conducting rigorous systematic reviews in medicine and health. It emphasizes evidence-based healthcare by integrating research, clinical expertise, and patient preferences for better decision-making.

Keywords:
guidemethodologyplatformssystematic reviewtools

More Related Videos

Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia
04:34

Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia

Published on: February 17, 2023

1.1K
Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI
06:26

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI

Published on: November 27, 2019

70.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 4, 2025

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

526
Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia
04:34

Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia

Published on: February 17, 2023

1.1K
Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI
06:26

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI

Published on: November 27, 2019

70.8K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Research
  • Health Sciences
  • Evidence-Based Practice

Background:

  • Systematic reviews are crucial for evidence-based healthcare.
  • Integrating research evidence, clinical proficiency, and patient preferences is essential.
  • Current practices require a structured approach for high-quality systematic reviews.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a concise 10-step guide for conducting systematic reviews in medicine and health.
  • To provide a practical framework for researchers in the field.
  • To enhance the transparency, precision, and overall quality of systematic reviews.

Main Methods:

  • Formulating precise research questions using frameworks like PICO(S), PEO, SPICE, and SPIDER.
  • Validating research ideas through preliminary investigations.
  • Documenting and registering protocols for transparency.
  • Conducting organized literature searches with expert involvement.
  • Utilizing diverse tools for efficient title and abstract screening.

Main Results:

  • A structured 10-step guide for systematic reviews is presented.
  • The guide emphasizes precision in question formulation and protocol registration.
  • It highlights the importance of expert-assisted literature searches and efficient screening methods.
  • The framework aims to improve the quality and effectiveness of systematic reviews.

Conclusions:

  • The 10-step guide offers a practical framework for rigorous systematic reviews in medicine and health.
  • It addresses field-specific challenges, promoting transparency and precision.
  • The guide contributes to building a robust evidence base for informed healthcare decisions.
  • It encourages continuous improvement in primary research practices.