Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2026

09:21
A Ligated Intestinal Loop Model in Anesthetized Specific Pathogen Free Chickens to Study Clostridium Perfringens Virulence
Published on: October 11, 2018
9.5K
Elucidating the Varying Impact of Necrotic Enteritis Using Performance and Health Indicators in Broiler Infection
S A S van der Klein1, C Evans2, J L M Marchal2
1Danisco Animal Nutrition & Health, IFF, Willem Einthovenstraat 4, 2342 BH, Oegstgeest, the Netherlands, sasha.vanderklein@iff.com.
Avian Diseases
|February 1, 2024
Summary
Necrotic enteritis (NE) challenge models show significant variability. Combining growth performance and gut integrity metrics improves the assessment of intervention efficacy in poultry.
Area of Science:
- Poultry Science
- Animal Health
- Infectious Disease Modeling
Background:
- Necrotic enteritis (NE) poses a significant economic threat to the poultry industry, exacerbated by the need to reduce antibiotic usage.
- NE challenge models are crucial for studying infection biology and developing novel interventions, but data comparing models and metrics are limited.
- Variability in challenge models and outcome measures hinders accurate assessment of intervention efficacy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare data from multiple NE challenge models across different geographical regions.
- To identify quantitative metrics that effectively differentiate between non-challenged control (NC) and challenged control (CC) groups.
- To determine the most accurate measures for predicting intervention efficacy in NE models.
Main Methods:
- Data from 10 independent NE-challenge trials using six challenge models in four regions were analyzed.
- Response variables included growth performance (weight gain, feed intake, FCR), health (mortality, lesion scores), and gut integrity (protein expression, permeability).
- Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was employed to discriminate between NC and CC groups using various response variables.
Main Results:
- Significant variability in bird responses to NE challenge was observed among models and trials.
- Lesion scores, NE-related mortality, reduced body weight, and increased FCR were consistently higher in CC versus NC groups.
- PCA combining performance and gut integrity variables, with data standardization, achieved better discrimination between NC and CC groups than performance indicators alone.
Conclusions:
- NE challenge models exhibit considerable variability, impacting the assessment of intervention efficacy.
- Integrating gut integrity metrics with performance indicators provides a more robust evaluation of NE challenge models.
- Key indicators like body weight, feed intake, FCR, mortality, and lesion scores, when analyzed together, can effectively predict NE status and intervention outcomes.

