Enabling Technologies for Gynecologic Vaginal Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Sunil Balgobin¹, Ethan M Balk, Anne E Porter+13

• ¹Division of Urogynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, and the Division of Urogynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas; the Center for Evidence Synthesis in Health, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; the Division of Urogynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico; the Woman's Center for Advanced Pelvic Surgery, Phoenix, Arizona; the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Urology, School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Waukesha, Wisconsin; the Division of Urogynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan; the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Health, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, New Jersey; and the Division of Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery, University of Louisville Health, Louisville, Kentucky.