Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2025

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
Published on: November 3, 2011
Pretraining Strategies for Structure Agnostic Material Property Prediction
Hongshuo Huang1, Rishikesh Magar2, Amir Barati Farimani1,2
1Department of Material Science and Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States.
Abstract:
In recent years, machine learning (ML), especially graph neural network (GNN) models, has been successfully used for fast and accurate prediction of material properties. However, most ML models rely on relaxed crystal structures to develop descriptors for accurate predictions. Generating these relaxed crystal structures can be expensive and time-consuming, thus requiring an additional processing step for models that rely on them. To address this challenge, structure-agnostic methods have been developed, which use fixed-length descriptors engineered based on human knowledge about the material. However, the fixed-length descriptors are often hand-engineered and require extensive domain knowledge and generally are not used in the context of learnable models which are known to have a superior performance. Recent advancements have proposed learnable frameworks that can construct representations based on stoichiometry alone, allowing the flexibility of using deep learning frameworks as well as leveraging structure-agnostic learning. In this work, we propose three different pretraining strategies that can be used to pretrain these structure-agnostic, learnable frameworks to further improve the downstream material property prediction performance. We incorporate strategies such as self-supervised learning (SSL), fingerprint learning (FL), and multimodal learning (ML) and demonstrate their efficacy on downstream tasks for the Roost architecture, a popular structure-agnostic framework. Our results show significant improvement in small data sets and data efficiency in the larger data sets, underscoring the potential of our pretrain strategies that effectively leverage unlabeled data for accurate material property prediction.
Related Concept Videos
Predicting Products: SN1 vs. SN2
With increased substitution on the alkyl halide,...
Predicting Products: Substitution vs. Elimination
The following factors can influence the mechanisms competing against each other:
Predicting Reaction Outcomes
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
Force Classification
Contact and non-contact forces are two of the most widely used categories of forces. As the name suggests, contact forces require physical contact between two objects to act upon each other. Examples of contact forces include frictional,...

