Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Optimal Arousal Theory

Optimal Arousal Theory

The optimal arousal theory suggests that performance is maximized when an individual experiences a moderate level of arousal. This theory is closely tied to the Yerkes-Dodson law, which illustrates an inverted U-shaped relationship between arousal and performance. The law, formulated by psychologists Robert Yerkes and John Dodson, implies an ideal arousal level for optimal performance, and deviations from this level can lead to declines in effectiveness.
Inverted U-Shaped Performance Curve
The...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Natural language processing captures memory content associated with shared neural patterns at encoding and retrieval.

Communications psychology·2026

Same author

Fixation-related potentials reveal that confusing program code elicits a late frontal positivity.

Scientific reports·2026

Same author

Forgetting as a consequence of retrieval suppression: A meta-analytic review.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026

Same author

How the brain segments experience: ERP evidence of event boundaries enhancing memory formation in narratives.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2026

Same author

A mega-analysis of EEG-based frontal-midline theta neurofeedback reveals learning dynamics, individual variability, and response profiles.

NeuroImage·2026

Same author

The search for meaning: Age-related differences in the semantic N400 effect for picture pairs are unrelated to semantic benefits in episodic memory.

Psychology and aging·2026

Same journal

Sensorimotor Adaptation of Vocal Pitch Is Impaired in Cerebellar Ataxia.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026

Same journal

Memory in the Palm of Your Hand: Smartphone-based Methods for Measuring Memory in the Wild.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026

Same journal

Processing Asymmetry in Object-modifying Relative Clauses: Evidence from Functional Connectivity.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026

Same journal

Extensive Experience Remodels Neural Task Circuitry to Escape the Frontal Bottleneck and Increase Automaticity of Categorization.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026

Same journal

Investigating the Effects of Acute Stress on Neural Mechanisms of Self-controlled Decision-making.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026

Same journal

Distilling the Neurophenomenological Signatures of Pure Awareness during Transcendental Meditation.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 4, 2025

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans

Published on: March 19, 2014

Curiosity Satisfaction Increases Event-related Potentials Sensitive to Reward.

Tim Rüterbories¹, Axel Mecklinger¹, Kathrin C J Eschmann²

¹Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany.

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

|February 2, 2024

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Curiosity enhances learning and memory by engaging reward processing systems in the brain. Increased curiosity leads to greater memory recall and is associated with specific brain signals (ERPs) similar to those seen in reward anticipation.

More Related Videos

A Fully Automated and Highly Versatile System for Testing Multi-cognitive Functions and Recording Neuronal Activities in Rodents

A Fully Automated and Highly Versatile System for Testing Multi-cognitive Functions and Recording Neuronal Activities in Rodents

Published on: May 3, 2012

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 4, 2025

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans

Published on: March 19, 2014

A Fully Automated and Highly Versatile System for Testing Multi-cognitive Functions and Recording Neuronal Activities in Rodents

A Fully Automated and Highly Versatile System for Testing Multi-cognitive Functions and Recording Neuronal Activities in Rodents

Published on: May 3, 2012

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Area of Science:

Cognitive Neuroscience
Educational Psychology

Background:

Learning is influenced by motivation, curiosity, and reward.
The precise relationship between curiosity, reward processing, and memory encoding remains unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate how curiosity states affect electroencephalography (EEG) signals related to reward processing.
To determine if these brain signals correlate with subsequent memory performance.

Main Methods:

Participants rated their curiosity and prior knowledge for trivia questions.
EEG data were collected during trivia answer presentation, focusing on reward positivity (RewP), P3, and late positive potential (LPP).
A surprise memory test assessed recall of trivia answers.

Main Results:

Higher curiosity correlated with better memory recall.
Increased curiosity was associated with larger amplitudes in RewP, P3, and LPP, indicating heightened reward processing.
RewP and P3 amplitudes were larger for recalled than forgotten answers, though curiosity did not influence this memory encoding effect.

Conclusions:

The brain's processing of curiosity satisfaction shares similarities with reward processing.
Curiosity may enhance learning and memory by leveraging neural mechanisms associated with reward.