Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

101
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
101
Longitudinal Research02:20

Longitudinal Research

12.0K
Sometimes we want to see how people change over time, as in studies of human development and lifespan. When we test the same group of individuals repeatedly over an extended period of time, we are conducting longitudinal research. Longitudinal research is a research design in which data-gathering is administered repeatedly over an extended period of time. For example, we may survey a group of individuals about their dietary habits at age 20, retest them a decade later at age 30, and then again...
12.0K
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

218
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
218
Introduction to Epidemiology01:26

Introduction to Epidemiology

732
Epidemiology, known as the cornerstone of public health, involves studying the distribution and determinants of health-related events in defined populations and applying these insights to control health issues. This is essential for understanding how diseases spread, identifying populations at greater risk, and implementing measures to control or prevent outbreaks. Epidemiology addresses not only infectious diseases but also non-communicable conditions like cancer and cardiovascular disease,...
732
Steps in Outbreak Investigation01:18

Steps in Outbreak Investigation

130
In the ever-evolving field of public health, statistical analysis serves as a cornerstone for understanding and managing disease outbreaks. By leveraging various statistical tools, health professionals can predict potential outbreaks, analyze ongoing situations, and devise effective responses to mitigate impact. For that to happen, there are a few possible stages of the analysis:
130
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

318
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
318

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

Evaluating the effect of social mobility on the incidence of HIV/AIDS in low-income populations: A dynamic microsimulation study with large cohort data.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same journal

Racism, mortification and carcerality: Three concepts needed to understand the experiences of racially minoritised people diagnosed with severe mental illness.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same journal

Physicians' viewpoints on initiating invasive mechanical ventilation in older persons: A Q methodology study in Japan.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same journal

Does who is counted matter? Comparing disability measures and self-rated health.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same journal

A longitudinal ethnographic exploration of actor power and agency in healthcare systems: The role of human and non-human actors in shaping care delivery and outcomes.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same journal

Working while living with cystic fibrosis: Why symptom severity tells us little about employment outcomes?

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 4, 2025

Swabbing the Urban Environment - A Pipeline for Sampling and Detection of SARS-CoV-2 From Environmental Reservoirs
07:13

Swabbing the Urban Environment - A Pipeline for Sampling and Detection of SARS-CoV-2 From Environmental Reservoirs

Published on: April 9, 2021

4.2K

Re-evaluating John Snow's 1856 south London study.

Thomas S Coleman1

  • 1Harris School of Public Policy, University of Chicago, 1307 E 60th St., Suite 3037, Chicago IL 60637, United States of America.

Social Science & Medicine (1982)
|February 3, 2024
PubMed
Summary

This study refutes claims of errors in John Snow's cholera research, confirming water's significant role in mortality during the 1854 London outbreak using modern statistical analysis.

Keywords:
Causal inferenceCholeraEpidemiologyHistory of scienceJohn SnowStatistical methodology

More Related Videos

Concentration of Virus Particles from Environmental Water and Wastewater Samples Using Skimmed Milk Flocculation and Ultrafiltration
10:53

Concentration of Virus Particles from Environmental Water and Wastewater Samples Using Skimmed Milk Flocculation and Ultrafiltration

Published on: March 17, 2023

1.6K
Use of Principal Components for Scaling Up Topographic Models to Map Soil Redistribution and Soil Organic Carbon
09:44

Use of Principal Components for Scaling Up Topographic Models to Map Soil Redistribution and Soil Organic Carbon

Published on: October 16, 2018

10.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 4, 2025

Swabbing the Urban Environment - A Pipeline for Sampling and Detection of SARS-CoV-2 From Environmental Reservoirs
07:13

Swabbing the Urban Environment - A Pipeline for Sampling and Detection of SARS-CoV-2 From Environmental Reservoirs

Published on: April 9, 2021

4.2K
Concentration of Virus Particles from Environmental Water and Wastewater Samples Using Skimmed Milk Flocculation and Ultrafiltration
10:53

Concentration of Virus Particles from Environmental Water and Wastewater Samples Using Skimmed Milk Flocculation and Ultrafiltration

Published on: March 17, 2023

1.6K
Use of Principal Components for Scaling Up Topographic Models to Map Soil Redistribution and Soil Organic Carbon
09:44

Use of Principal Components for Scaling Up Topographic Models to Map Soil Redistribution and Soil Organic Carbon

Published on: October 16, 2018

10.2K

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Medical History
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • John Snow's 1856 work identified water as a primary factor in cholera mortality during the 1854 South London outbreak.
  • A 2006 re-assessment by Koch and Denike alleged critical errors in Snow's analysis, questioning his conclusions.
  • This paper addresses the validity of Koch and Denike's critique of Snow's seminal epidemiological study.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To re-evaluate the claims of arithmetic and conceptual errors in John Snow's cholera mortality analysis.
  • To assess the appropriateness of statistical methods applied to Snow's data by Koch and Denike.
  • To validate Snow's findings on the influence of water on cholera mortality using contemporary statistical approaches.

Main Methods:

  • Critical review of Koch and Denike's re-assessment of John Snow's 1854 cholera outbreak data.
  • Application of modern statistical tools to Snow's original data, following his analytical approach.
  • Identification of misinterpretations and inappropriate statistical tests used in the critique of Snow's work.

Main Results:

  • Koch and Denike's claims of errors in Snow's analysis are found to be incorrect, stemming from misinterpretations of the data.
  • The statistical methods employed by Koch and Denike were inappropriate for the data and historical context.
  • Modern statistical analysis, applied to Snow's original data and methodology, strongly corroborates his conclusions.
  • Snow's original data, when analyzed correctly, supports the primacy of water in explaining cholera mortality variations.

Conclusions:

  • John Snow's original analysis of the 1854 South London cholera outbreak regarding water's influence is scientifically sound.
  • The critique by Koch and Denike is invalidated by misreading historical data and applying incorrect statistical methods.
  • This study reaffirms the foundational importance of John Snow's work in epidemiology and public health.