Sex differences in surgical site infections following coronary artery bypass grafting: a retrospective observational...

Surgical site infection (SSI) following cardiac surgery poses a significant challenge for healthcare providers. Despite advances in surgical techniques and infection control measures, SSI remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, in addition to being a significant economic burden on healthcare services. Current literature suggests there is a reproducible difference in the incidence of SSI following cardiac surgery between sexes. We aim to assess the sex-specific predictive risk factors for sternal SSI following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in addition to identifying any differences in the causative organisms between groups.

Adult patients undergoing isolated CABG between January 2012 and December 2022 in one UK hospital organization were included. In this 10-year, retrospective observational study, a total of 10,208 patients met the inclusion criteria. Pre-operative risk factors were identified using univariate analysis. To assess dependence between sex and organism or Gram stain, a Pearson Chi-squared test with Yates correction for continuity was performed.

In total there were 8457 males of which 181 developed a sternal SSI (2.14%) and 1751 females, 128 of whom had a sternal SSI (7.31%). Male patients were found to be significantly more likely to develop an SSI secondary to a Gram-positive organism, whereas female patients were more likely to have a Gram-negative causative organism (P<0.00001). Staphylococcus was statistically more likely to be the causative organism genus in male patients. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was found to be twice as common in the female cohort compared with the male group.

In our study, we found a statistically significant difference in the causative organisms and Gram stain for post-CABG sternal SSIs between males and females. Male patients predominately have Gram-positive associated SSIs, whereas female SSI pathogens are more likely to be Gram negative. The preoperative risk profiles of both cohorts are similar, including being an insulin-dependent diabetic and triple vessel coronary artery disease. Given these findings, it prompts the question, should we be tailoring our SSI treatment strategies according to sex and associated risk profiles?