Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 4, 2026

A Rat Carotid Artery Pressure-Controlled Segmental Balloon Injury with Periadventitial Therapeutic Application
Published on: July 9, 2020
Sirolimus-coated balloon in all-comer population of coronary artery disease patients: the EASTBOURNE DIABETES
Gianluca Caiazzo1, Angelo Oliva2,3, Luca Testa4
1U.O.C. UTIC-Cardiologia, P.O. San Giuseppe Moscati - Aversa - ASL Caserta, Aversa, Italy.
Diabetic patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with sirolimus-coated balloons (SCB) showed no significant increase in target lesion revascularization (TLR). Diabetic status did not impact SCB device performance for de-novo or in-stent restenosis lesions.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Diabetes Mellitus Research
Background:
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) outcomes in diabetic patients remain suboptimal.
- The efficacy of drug-coated balloons (DCB) in diabetic patients undergoing PCI is not well-established.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the impact of diabetes mellitus on PCI outcomes using the MagicTouch sirolimus-coated balloon (SCB).
- To evaluate the performance of SCB in diabetic versus non-diabetic patients.
Main Methods:
- Subgroup analysis from the prospective, multicenter EASTBOURNE registry.
- Comparison of MagicTouch SCB performance in diabetic and non-diabetic patients.
- Primary endpoint: target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 12 months. Secondary endpoints: major adverse clinical events (MACE), death, myocardial infarction (MI), and bleeding.
Main Results:
- Diabetes was present in 41.5% of 2,083 patients.
- Diabetic patients showed numerically higher rates of TLR, death, and MACE.
- Significantly higher incidence of spontaneous myocardial infarction (MI) in diabetic patients (3.4% vs. 1.5%).
- No significant difference in bleeding events between groups.
- In-stent restenosis (ISR) had higher TLR than de-novo lesions, irrespective of diabetes.
Conclusions:
- Diabetic patients treated with MagicTouch SCB did not experience a significant increase in TLR compared to non-diabetic patients.
- Diabetic status did not affect SCB device performance regarding TLR in both de-novo and ISR lesions.
More Related Videos
07:25Predicting Amputation using Local Circulating Mononuclear Progenitor Cells in Angioplasty-treated Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia
Published on: September 22, 2020
05:44Author Spotlight: Utilizing Venoplasty Balloon Model in Rodents to Simulate Surgical Interventions for Deep Veins
Published on: May 24, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Treatment for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors
Among the PDE5 inhibitors, sildenafil (Revatio) stands out as a competitive and selective inhibitor. It operates by elevating cellular levels of cGMP and augmenting signaling through the cGMP-PKG pathway, promoting vasodilation. Upon oral...
Treatment for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Endothelin Receptor Antagonists
ETs are synthesized through a complex sequence of enzymatic steps, primarily involving an enzyme referred to as endothelin-converting enzyme...
Rheumatic Heart Disease III: Medical Management
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Diabetic Retinopathy
Diabetic Nephropathy