Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2025
Characterization at the Molecular Level using Robust Biochemical Approaches of a New Kinase Protein
Published on: June 30, 2019
Comparison of three methods for the detection of antibodies against muscle-specific kinase
Kyphuong Luong1, Bucky K Lozier1, Camille L Novis1
1ARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, 500 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA.
Objectives:
To compare 3 different methods for the detection of antibodies against muscle-specific kinase (MuSK).
Methods:
MuSK antibody testing was performed in 237 serum samples by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and fixed cell-based assay (f-CBA-IFA). One hundred and forty-eight (148) of the sera had previously been tested by RIA during clinical testing: 47 MuSK antibody positive and 101 MuSK antibody negative. Of the MuSK RIA negative antibodies, 46 tested positive for other neural antibodies. Additionally, 89 sera were subsequently tested by all three methods: 70 healthy controls and 19 sera positive for other neural antibodies.
Results:
Qualitative inter-assay agreement based on tiered RIA values was 100% for results of 1.00 nmol/L or greater by both methods; 81% and 94% for results between 0.21 and 0.99 nmol/L by ELISA and f-CBA-IFA, respectively; and 0% for results of 0.04-0.20 nmol/L by both methods. Negative results showed 100% agreement between RIA and both ELISA and f-CBA-IFA (n = 55). None of the controls positive for other neural autoantibodies or healthy controls were positive in any assay.
Conclusion:
Overall, excellent agreement was observed between the 3 methods used to detect antibodies against MuSK. Both the f-CBA-IFA and ELISA performed comparably to RIA and exhibited excellent overall accuracy for MuSK IgG detection, with the f-CBA-IFA demonstrating higher agreement between positive samples with the RIA than the ELISA without identifying false positives in the control samples. Advantages of non-radioactive methods for the detection of MuSK antibodies include reduced handling and disposal of hazardous materials, potential for automation and the reagents having a longer shelf-life, reducing costs associated with both workflow and lot validations. Thus, commercially available ELISA and transfected cell-based assays are viable alternatives to the traditional radioactive assay used for serologic determination of MuSK IgG.
