Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2025

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts
Published on: January 29, 2018
A novel non-invasive method for predicting bone mineral density and fracture risk using demographic and
Justin Aflatooni1, Steven Martin2, Adib Edilbi1
1Orthopedic Biomechanics Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
Abstract:
Fractures are costly to treat and can significantly increase morbidity. Although dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) is used to screen at risk people with low bone mineral density (BMD), not all areas have access to one. We sought to create a readily accessible, inexpensive, high-throughput prediction tool for BMD that may identify people at risk of fracture for further evaluation. Anthropometric and demographic data were collected from 492 volunteers (♂275, ♀217; [44 ± 20] years; Body Mass Index (BMI) = [27.6 ± 6.0] kg/m2) in addition to total body bone mineral content (BMC, kg) and BMD measurements of the spine, pelvis, arms, legs and total body. Multiple-linear-regression with step-wise removal was used to develop a two-step prediction model for BMC followed by BMC. Model selection was determined by the highest adjusted R2, lowest error of estimate, and lowest level of variance inflation (α = 0.05). Height (HTcm), age (years), sexm=1, f=0, %body fat (%fat), fat free mass (FFMkg), fat mass (FMkg), leg length (LLcm), shoulder width (SHWDTHcm), trunk length (TRNKLcm), and pelvis width (PWDTHcm) were observed to be significant predictors in the following two-step model (p < 0.05). Step1: BMC (kg) = (0.006 3 HT) + (-0.002 4 AGE) + (0.171 2 SEXm=1, f=0) + (0.031 4 FFM) + (0.001 FM) + (0.008 9 SHWDTH) + (-0.014 5 TRNKL) + (-0.027 8 PWDTH) - 0.507 3; R2 = 0.819, SE ± 0.301. Step2: Total body BMD (g/cm2) = (-0.002 8 HT) + (-0.043 7 SEXm=1, f=0) + (0.000 8 %FAT) + (0.297 0 BMC) + (-0.002 3 LL) + (0.002 3 SHWDTH) + (-0.002 5 TRNKL) + (-0.011 3 PWDTH) + 1.379; R = 0.89, SE ± 0.054. Similar models were also developed to predict leg, arm, spine, and pelvis BMD (R = 0.796-0.864, p < 0.05). The equations developed here represent promising tools for identifying individuals with low BMD at risk of fracture who would benefit from further evaluation, especially in the resource or time restricted setting.
More Related Videos
09:02Cortical Bone Assessment Using Ultrasonic Guided Waves: A Reproducibility Study in a Healthy Population
Published on: January 31, 2025
07:12Semiautomated Longitudinal Microcomputed Tomography-based Quantitative Structural Analysis of a Nude Rat Osteoporosis-related Vertebral Fracture Model
Published on: September 28, 2017