Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2025

06:20
Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
Published on: March 11, 2021
7.3K
Technical note: Errors introduced when using Dose Voxel Kernels for estimating absorbed dose from radiopharmaceutical
Jonathan Tranel1, Stig Palm2, Felix Y Feng3,4
1Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Medical Physics
|February 5, 2024
Summary
Dose voxel kernels (DVK) overestimate absorbed dose for alpha emitters in radiopharmaceutical therapy. Monte Carlo simulations are more accurate for alpha particle dosimetry, unlike beta emitters where DVK is sufficient.
Area of Science:
- Medical Physics
- Radiopharmaceutical Therapy
- Radiation Dosimetry
Background:
- Radiopharmaceutical therapies (RPT) often use dose voxel kernels (DVK) for absorbed dose (Dabs) calculations, offering speed and ease over Monte Carlo (MC) simulations.
- DVK assumes non-stochastic particle distribution, valid for beta emitters due to high particle counts per cell kill.
- Alpha particles' high linear energy transfer (LET) means a single traversal can kill a cell, necessitating lower activity and potentially causing DVK errors in Dabs calculations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare Dabs calculations using DVK and MC methods for beta and alpha emitters in small tumors.
- To illustrate the impact of DVK on Dabs estimations for alpha RPT at the microscale.
Main Methods:
- A tumor cluster model was used to compare DVK and MC methods for beta (177Lu) and alpha (211At, 225Ac, 227Th) irradiations.
- Simulations used 10^3 beta particles and 20 alpha particles per cell, reflecting clinically relevant scenarios.
- Results were analyzed using Dabs histograms, dose volume histograms, and Dabs error maps.
Main Results:
- For beta emitters (177Lu), DVK and MC methods yielded similar Dabs results.
- For all alpha emitters studied, DVK methods significantly overestimated Dabs compared to MC simulations.
- Error maps highlighted discrepancies in Dabs distribution between DVK and MC for alpha emitters.
Conclusions:
- DVK methods can lead to substantial overestimation of Dabs for alpha emitters in RPT.
- The mean Dabs metric alone may be insufficient when using DVK for alpha emitter dosimetry.
- MC simulations are recommended for accurate Dabs calculations in alpha RPT, especially at the microscale.
Related Concept Videos
Biological Effects of Radiation
15.5K
All radioactive nuclides emit high-energy particles or electromagnetic waves. When this radiation encounters living cells, it can cause heating, break chemical bonds, or ionize molecules. The most serious biological damage results when these radioactive emissions fragment or ionize molecules. For example, α and β particles emitted from nuclear decay reactions possess much higher energies than ordinary chemical bond energies. When these particles strike and penetrate matter, they...
15.5K
Positron Emission Tomography
4.2K
Positron emission tomography (PET) is a medical imaging technique involving radiopharmaceuticals — substances that emit short-lived radiation. Although the first PET scanner was introduced in 1961, it took 15 more years before radiopharmaceuticals were combined with the technique and revolutionized its potential.
One of the main requirements of a PET scan is a positron-emitting radioisotope, which is produced in a cyclotron and then attached to a substance used by the part of the body...
One of the main requirements of a PET scan is a positron-emitting radioisotope, which is produced in a cyclotron and then attached to a substance used by the part of the body...
4.2K
Types of Radioactivity
16.8K
The most common types of radioactivity are α decay, β decay, γ decay, neutron emission, and electron capture.
Alpha (α) decay is the emission of an α particle from the nucleus. For example, polonium-210 undergoes α decay:
Alpha (α) decay is the emission of an α particle from the nucleus. For example, polonium-210 undergoes α decay:
16.8K

