Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2026

Detection of Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis in Haematological Malignancy Patients by using Lateral-flow Technology
Published on: March 22, 2012
Evaluation of pathogen from the FilmArray meningitis/encephalitis panel and recommendations on atypical findings
Luiz Gustavo Ferreira Côrtes1, Mariana Menezes Maldonado1, Paula Celia Mariko Koga1
1Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Laboratório Clínico, São Paulo SP, Brazil.
Background:
Infectious meningoencephalitis is a potentially fatal clinical condition that causes inflammation of the central nervous system secondary to the installation of different microorganisms. The FilmArray meningitis/encephalitis panel allows the simultaneous detection of 14 pathogens with results in about one hour.
Objective:
This study is based on retrospectively evaluating the implementation of the FilmArray meningitis/encephalitis panel in a hospital environment, highlighting the general results and, especially, analyzing the consistency of the test results against the clinical and laboratory conditions of the patients.
Methods:
Data were collected through the results reported by the BioFire FilmArray system software from the meningitis/encephalitis panel. The correlated laboratory tests used in our analysis, when available, included biochemical, cytological, direct and indirect microbiological tests.
Results:
In the analyzed period, there were 496 samples with released results. Of the total of 496 samples analyzed, 88 (17.75%) were considered positive, and 90 pathogens were detected, and in 2 of these (2.27%) there was co-detection of pathogens. Viruses were the agents most frequently found within the total number of pathogens detected. Of the 496 proven samples, 20 (4.03%) were repeated, 5 of which were repeated due to invalid results, 6 due to the detection of multiple pathogens and 9 due to disagreement between the panel results and the other laboratory tests and/or divergence of the clinical-epidemiological picture. Of these 20 repeated samples, only 4 of them (20%) maintained the original result after repeating the test, with 16 (80%) being non-reproducible. The main factor related to the disagreement of these 16 samples during retesting was the detection of bacterial agents without any relationship with other laboratory tests or with the patients' clinical condition.
Conclusion:
In our study, simply reproducing tests with atypical results from the FilmArray meningitis/encephalitis panel proved, in most cases, effective and sufficient for interpreting these results.
Insights
Reproducing atypical results from the FilmArray meningitis/encephalitis panel is effective. This approach helps interpret discordant findings, particularly bacterial detections, improving diagnostic accuracy for infectious meningoencephalitis.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Microbiology
- Infectious Diseases
- Molecular Diagnostics
Background:
- Infectious meningoencephalitis poses a significant threat, causing central nervous system inflammation due to various microorganisms.
- The FilmArray meningitis/encephalitis panel offers rapid, simultaneous detection of 14 key pathogens.
Purpose of the Study:
- To retrospectively evaluate the implementation and performance of the FilmArray meningitis/encephalitis panel in a hospital setting.
- To analyze the consistency of panel results against clinical and laboratory data.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of results from the BioFire FilmArray system's meningitis/encephalitis panel.
- Correlated laboratory tests included biochemical, cytological, and microbiological analyses.
- Investigation of discordant results through retesting and clinical-epidemiological review.
Main Results:
- Out of 496 samples, 88 (17.75%) were positive, detecting 90 pathogens, with viruses being the most common.
- 20 samples (4.03%) required retesting due to invalid results, multiple pathogen detection, or discordant findings.
- 80% of retested samples with initial atypical results were non-reproducible, often linked to bacterial detections inconsistent with clinical data.
Conclusions:
- Retesting atypical results from the FilmArray meningitis/encephalitis panel is an effective method for result interpretation.
- This approach is crucial for resolving discrepancies and ensuring accurate diagnosis of infectious meningoencephalitis.
More Related Videos
09:58Environmental Screening of Aeromonas hydrophila, Mycobacterium spp., and Pseudocapillaria tomentosa in Zebrafish Systems
Published on: December 8, 2017
08:20Hippocampal Neuronal Cultures to Detect and Study New Pathogenic Antibodies Involved in Autoimmune Encephalitis
Published on: June 2, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Bacterial Meningitis
Viral Meningitis
Arboviral Encephalitis
Cryptococcal Meningitis
Bacterial Meningitis II: Pathophysiology
Encephalitis ll: Pathophysiology