Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Matched Pairs01:09

Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Matched Pairs

128
The Wilcoxon signed-rank test for matched pairs evaluates the null hypothesis by combining the ranks of differences with their signs. It essentially tests whether the median of the differences in a population of matched pairs is zero. Since the test incorporates more information than the sign test, it generally yields more trustable conclusions. This test also does not require the data to follow a normal distribution, but two conditions must be met for it to be applicable: (1) the data must...
128
Sign Test for Matched Pairs01:17

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

131
The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
131
Cluster Sampling Method01:20

Cluster Sampling Method

11.9K
Appropriate sampling methods ensure that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
11.9K
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

6.9K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
6.9K
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

188
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
188
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS01:11

Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS

13.4K
Genome-wide association studies or GWAS are used to identify whether common SNPs are associated with certain diseases. Suppose specific SNPs are more frequently observed in individuals with a particular disease than those without the disease. In that case, those SNPs are said to be associated with the disease. Chi-square analysis is performed to check the probability of the allele likely to be associated with the disease.
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
13.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Animal husbandry and environmental conditions are associated with cefotaxime-resistant Escherichia coli in yard soil in peri-urban Malawi.

PLOS global public health·2026
Same author

Serum Folate Forms Show Dose-Dependent Increases in Nonpregnant Ethiopian Women of Reproductive Age Participating in a Randomized Controlled Trial with Double-Fortified Salt Containing Iodine and Folic Acid.

Current developments in nutrition·2026
Same author

Efficacy of multiple micronutrient supplements during pregnancy on zinc status among pregnant women in Ghana: a randomized controlled trial.

The Journal of nutrition·2026
Same author

A train-and-assist device that upskills novices to strengthen the workforce and expand diagnostic access.

PNAS nexus·2026
Same author

Antimicrobial-resistant <i>E. coli</i> in human, animal and environmental reservoirs in rural Bangladeshi households with young children.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Cardiometabolic Risk in U.S. Pregnant Women and Associations with Food Insecurity, Diet Quality, and Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children Participation.

The Journal of nutrition·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 4, 2025

Combined Immunofluorescence and DNA FISH on 3D-preserved Interphase Nuclei to Study Changes in 3D Nuclear Organization
13:55

Combined Immunofluorescence and DNA FISH on 3D-preserved Interphase Nuclei to Study Changes in 3D Nuclear Organization

Published on: February 3, 2013

18.4K

Geographic pair matching in large-scale cluster randomized trials.

Benjamin F Arnold1,2, Francois Rerolle3, Christine Tedijanto3

  • 1Francis I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. ben.arnold@ucsf.edu.

Nature Communications
|February 5, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Geographic pair matching significantly improves statistical efficiency in large public health trials. This method can halve the required sample size for cluster randomized trials, reducing costs and enhancing precision for child health outcomes.

More Related Videos

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
14:27

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

15.7K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 4, 2025

Combined Immunofluorescence and DNA FISH on 3D-preserved Interphase Nuclei to Study Changes in 3D Nuclear Organization
13:55

Combined Immunofluorescence and DNA FISH on 3D-preserved Interphase Nuclei to Study Changes in 3D Nuclear Organization

Published on: February 3, 2013

18.4K
Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
14:27

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

15.7K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.5K

Area of Science:

  • Public Health Research
  • Biostatistics
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Cluster randomized trials are essential for evaluating large-scale public health interventions.
  • Statistical efficiency is critical in large trials, impacting sample size and cost.
  • Geographic location is a readily available feature integrating socio-demographic and environmental factors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the impact of geographic pair matching on statistical efficiency in cluster randomized trials.
  • To evaluate the benefits of this design for child health outcomes.
  • To explore the potential for estimating spatially varying effect heterogeneity.

Main Methods:

  • Re-analysis of two large-scale cluster randomized trials on child health in Bangladesh and Kenya.
  • Application of pair matching based on geographic location.
  • Assessment of statistical efficiency gains across 14 child health outcomes.

Main Results:

  • Pair matching by geographic location yielded substantial statistical efficiency gains (relative efficiencies ≥1.1, often >2.0).
  • This implies an unmatched trial may need double the clusters for equivalent precision.
  • Geographically matched designs facilitate estimation of fine-scale, spatially varying effect heterogeneity.

Conclusions:

  • Geographic pair matching offers broad and substantial benefits for large-scale, cluster randomized trials.
  • The method significantly enhances statistical efficiency and precision.
  • It provides a valuable tool for optimizing trial design and resource allocation in public health research.