Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

416
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
416
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

170
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
170
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data01:25

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

366
Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods:
366
Introduction to Epidemiology01:26

Introduction to Epidemiology

732
Epidemiology, known as the cornerstone of public health, involves studying the distribution and determinants of health-related events in defined populations and applying these insights to control health issues. This is essential for understanding how diseases spread, identifying populations at greater risk, and implementing measures to control or prevent outbreaks. Epidemiology addresses not only infectious diseases but also non-communicable conditions like cancer and cardiovascular disease,...
732
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

101
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
101
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

271
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
271

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparison of Outcomes of Leadless Versus Transvenous Pacemakers Following Tricuspid Valve Surgery.

Journal of the American Heart Association·2026
Same author

Outcomes of Percutaneous and Surgical Interventions of Right-Sided Heart Masses in Older Patients: A Nationwide Comparative Study.

Journal of the American Heart Association·2026
Same author

Long-Term Outcomes After Ischemic Stroke Across Atrial Fibrillation Phenotypes Defined by Detection Timing and Prior Anticoagulation Status.

Neurology·2026
Same author

Association of Subclinical Cardiac Remodeling With Incident Cancer in the MESA Cohort.

Journal of the American Heart Association·2026
Same author

Sociodemographic Factors related to Financial Toxicity among Cancer Patients and Survivors:"The Second Cancer Patient Experience Survey" - A Nationwide Study in Japan.

Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer·2026
Same author

Area-level socioeconomic deprivation and suicide by household income: a nationwide cohort study 2015-23.

International journal of epidemiology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 4, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.5K

Harnessing causal forests for epidemiologic research: key considerations.

Koichiro Shiba1, Kosuke Inoue2,3

  • 1Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, MA 02118, United States.

American Journal of Epidemiology
|February 6, 2024
PubMed
Summary

This commentary clarifies causal forest methods for estimating heterogeneous treatment effects (HTEs) in epidemiology. It offers practical guidance beyond existing work, enhancing the application of causal forest for researchers.

Keywords:
causal forestsconditional average treatment effectsheterogeneous treatment effects

More Related Videos

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
12:44

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Published on: July 24, 2016

8.0K
Visualizing Field Data Collection Procedures of Exposure and Biomarker Assessments for the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network Trial in India
09:33

Visualizing Field Data Collection Procedures of Exposure and Biomarker Assessments for the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network Trial in India

Published on: December 23, 2022

2.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 4, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.5K
Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
12:44

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Published on: July 24, 2016

8.0K
Visualizing Field Data Collection Procedures of Exposure and Biomarker Assessments for the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network Trial in India
09:33

Visualizing Field Data Collection Procedures of Exposure and Biomarker Assessments for the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network Trial in India

Published on: December 23, 2022

2.2K

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Machine Learning
  • Causal Inference

Background:

  • Assessing heterogeneous treatment effects (HTEs) is crucial in epidemiology.
  • Causal forest, a machine learning tool, offers a flexible approach to evaluating complex HTEs.
  • Jawadekar et al. recently introduced causal forest and provided initial guidelines for its application.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide additional insights and guidance on understanding and applying causal forest in epidemiologic research.
  • To clarify conceptual aspects of causal forest, such as honesty versus cross-fitting and interpretation of conditional average treatment effects.
  • To address practical considerations not covered by Jawadekar et al., including motivations for HTE estimation and calibration approaches.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual clarification of causal forest principles.
  • Exploration of honesty and cross-fitting distinctions.
  • Discussion of practical considerations: motivations for HTEs, calibration, and leveraging output.
  • Use of simulated data examples to illustrate concepts.

Main Results:

  • Provides conceptual clarifications on causal forest, differentiating key techniques.
  • Offers practical guidance on applying causal forest, including calibration and interpretation.
  • Illustrates causal forest applications with simulated data examples.

Conclusions:

  • Causal forest is a valuable tool for epidemiologic research on HTEs.
  • Further advancements and considerations are needed for broader application of causal forest.
  • This commentary enhances understanding and practical use of causal forest in epidemiology.