Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Somatosensation01:33

Somatosensation

The somatosensory system relays sensory information from the skin, mucous membranes, limbs, and joints. Somatosensation is more familiarly known as the sense of touch. A typical somatosensory pathway includes three types of long neurons: primary, secondary, and tertiary. Primary neurons have cell bodies located near the spinal cord in groups of neurons called dorsal root ganglia. The sensory neurons of ganglia innervate designated areas of skin called dermatomes.
Sensory Perception: Organization of the Somatosensory System01:11

Sensory Perception: Organization of the Somatosensory System

The somatosensory system is the central and peripheral nervous system component that senses and processes touch, pressure, pain, temperature, and body position or proprioception. The process of sensation takes place at three levels:
The receptor level:
The receptor level is the first stage of sensation. It involves the detection of a stimulus by specialized sensory receptors. The stimulus must arrive within the receptor's receptive field. Next, the receptor converts the energy of the stimulus...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Warthin tumor of the lacrimal sac: a rare manifestation.

Orbit (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2026
Same author

Comparison of the treatment outcomes and identification of the risk factors associated with unfavorable outcomes among extra pulmonary and pulmonary tuberculosis patients under NTEP.

BMC infectious diseases·2026
Same author

Development of Bioisosteres of Iboga Alkaloids: A Step-Economical Synthesis to Enhance the Antinociceptive and Anxiolytic Activity with Neuroprotective Effects.

ACS pharmacology & translational science·2026
Same author

Broadband GaP contact-grating terahertz source pumped at 3.9 µm.

Optics express·2026
Same author

Giant primary splenic hydatid cyst: diagnostic and therapeutic challenges.

BMJ case reports·2026
Same author

Caspase-6 Controls Lipid and Energy Metabolism in Diet-Induced Obesity.

Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)·2026
Same journal

Crip Haptic Jam: Vibrotactile Composition for Disability-Centered Dance.

IEEE transactions on haptics·2026
Same journal

Embodied Care and Consent in Mediated Social Touch Interactions: A Study of the Interactive Artwork The Alien Between Us.

IEEE transactions on haptics·2026
Same journal

Investigating the Perception of Shape-Changing Haptic Interfaces.

IEEE transactions on haptics·2026
Same journal

Vibrations Feel Longer than their Visual Analogues in Virtual Reality.

IEEE transactions on haptics·2026
Same journal

Power from Potential: A Survey of Electrostatic Actuators for Haptics.

IEEE transactions on haptics·2026
Same journal

Investigating the Role of Vibrotactile Cue Sequencing in Inducing Intuitive Wrist Motion from a Stationary Pose.

IEEE transactions on haptics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 7, 2026

Measurement of Vibration Detection Threshold and Tactile Spatial Acuity in Human Subjects
07:32

Measurement of Vibration Detection Threshold and Tactile Spatial Acuity in Human Subjects

Published on: September 1, 2016

12.7K

Bi-Manual Sensory Discrimination: A Kinesthetic Study.

Suhas Kakade, Subhasis Chaudhuri, Abhishek Gupta

    IEEE Transactions on Haptics
    |February 6, 2024
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Bi-manual tasks impair kinesthetic perception compared to uni-manual tasks, showing higher thresholds. Dominant and non-dominant hands also exhibit different kinesthetic perception abilities.

    More Related Videos

    A Simple Non-invasive Method for Temporary Knockdown of Upper Limb Proprioception
    07:42

    A Simple Non-invasive Method for Temporary Knockdown of Upper Limb Proprioception

    Published on: March 3, 2018

    9.5K
    Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator TSPAS
    04:40

    Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator TSPAS

    Published on: July 30, 2020

    2.9K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: May 7, 2026

    Measurement of Vibration Detection Threshold and Tactile Spatial Acuity in Human Subjects
    07:32

    Measurement of Vibration Detection Threshold and Tactile Spatial Acuity in Human Subjects

    Published on: September 1, 2016

    12.7K
    A Simple Non-invasive Method for Temporary Knockdown of Upper Limb Proprioception
    07:42

    A Simple Non-invasive Method for Temporary Knockdown of Upper Limb Proprioception

    Published on: March 3, 2018

    9.5K
    Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator TSPAS
    04:40

    Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator TSPAS

    Published on: July 30, 2020

    2.9K

    Area of Science:

    • * Neuroscience
    • * Human Motor Control
    • * Sensory Perception

    Background:

    • * Kinesthetic sensory information is crucial for daily activities and motor control.
    • * Understanding kinesthetic perception differences between uni-manual and bi-manual tasks is important for human-computer interaction and rehabilitation.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • * To investigate the impact of asynchronous bi-manual discrimination tasks versus uni-manual tasks on kinesthetic perception.
    • * To determine perceptual thresholds for dominant hand, non-dominant hand, and simultaneous bi-manual use.
    • * To explore the relationship between task nature and kinesthetic perception of haptic signals.

    Main Methods:

    • * Participants performed uni-manual (dominant/non-dominant hand) and bi-manual kinesthetic discrimination tasks.
    • * Force signals were presented successively, and participants reported perceived magnitude changes.
    • * Psychometric functions were applied to determine perceptual thresholds from collected responses.

    Main Results:

    • * Bi-manual tasks showed significantly higher perceptual thresholds than uni-manual tasks, indicating reduced kinesthetic ability.
    • * Distinct perception thresholds were observed between the dominant and non-dominant hands.
    • * Task modality (uni-manual vs. bi-manual) significantly influences kinesthetic sensory discrimination.

    Conclusions:

    • * Simultaneous bi-manual discrimination tasks lead to inferior kinesthetic perception compared to uni-manual tasks.
    • * Differences in perceptual capability exist between dominant and non-dominant hands.
    • * Findings have implications for designing effective haptic interfaces and understanding motor control limitations.