Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2025

Subcutaneous Infection of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus MRSA
Published on: February 9, 2011
Should Contact Precautions Be Used for Patients with MRSA Infection and Colonization in Acute Care Settings?
Suellen Li1,2, Molly L Paras3
1Editorial Fellow, NEJM Evidence.
Abstract:
Are Contact Precautions for Patients with MRSA Useful?MRSA infections lead to substantial morbidity and mortality. Hospitals commonly implement "contact precautions" to reduce MRSA transmission; however, recent studies have challenged the effectiveness of this strategy, and the use of contact precautions has been associated with certain adverse events. This article reviews the existing evidence and proposes a randomized trial to assess the efficacy of contact precautions in preventing MRSA transmission.
Insights
Contact precautions for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) may not be effective and can cause harm. Further research, including a randomized trial, is needed to determine their true efficacy in preventing MRSA transmission.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Hospital Epidemiology
- Clinical Practice Guidelines
Background:
- Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections contribute significantly to patient morbidity and mortality.
- Hospitals widely use contact precautions to curb MRSA transmission, but their effectiveness is increasingly debated.
- Concerns exist regarding adverse events associated with the implementation of contact precautions.
Approach:
- This article critically reviews the current body of evidence on the utility of contact precautions for MRSA.
- It highlights studies questioning the efficacy of this infection control strategy.
- The authors propose a randomized trial to rigorously evaluate the impact of contact precautions on MRSA transmission.
Key Points:
- Evidence supporting the effectiveness of contact precautions in reducing MRSA transmission is inconclusive.
- The use of contact precautions has been linked to negative patient outcomes and healthcare worker burden.
- A well-designed randomized trial is essential to definitively assess the benefits versus harms.
Conclusions:
- The routine use of contact precautions for MRSA warrants re-evaluation based on existing evidence.
- Further investigation is critical to optimize MRSA infection control strategies.
- A proposed randomized trial aims to provide definitive data on the efficacy of contact precautions.
Related Concept Videos
Transmission-based Precautions I: Contact, Enteric, and Droplets
Contact Precautions:
Contact precautions are the measures taken to prevent the transmission of infectious agents, especially epidemiologically important microorganisms such as MRSA or influenza, primarily transmitted through direct or indirect contact with an...
Standard Precaution
Hand hygiene is the most crucial means to prevent the transmission of disease. Employers are legally required to provide their workers with personal protective equipment (PPE) to minimize exposure or contact with...
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Transmission-based Precautions II: Airborne and Protective Environment
Airborne precautions:
Use airborne precautions when treating patients known or suspected to have diseases that spread through the air—for example, tuberculosis or measles. These organisms are present in smaller droplets expelled by an infected person and...
Hand hygiene
Hand washing...
Handwashing III: During the Procedure and Post-Procedure Steps

