Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2025

Testing the Efficacy of Pharmacological Agents in a Pericardial Target Delivery Model in the Swine
Published on: July 7, 2016
Use of Win Statistics to Analyze Outcomes in the DAPA-HF and DELIVER Trials
Toru Kondo1,2, Samvel B Gasparyan3, Pardeep S Jhund1
1British Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Dapagliflozin significantly improved composite heart failure outcomes, including patient-reported symptoms and total events, in the DAPA-HF and DELIVER trials. This analysis highlights the benefits of dapagliflozin for heart failure patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Clinical Trials
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Heart failure (HF) trials typically use composite endpoints focusing on initial events and cardiovascular death.
- Patient-reported outcomes like symptoms and quality of life are crucial but often analyzed separately.
- Win statistics offer a method to integrate diverse outcomes hierarchically into a single composite endpoint.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effect of dapagliflozin versus placebo on a hierarchical composite outcome in patients with heart failure.
- To assess the impact of dapagliflozin on cardiovascular death, total HF hospitalizations, urgent HF visits, and patient-reported symptom scores (KCCQ-TSS).
- To demonstrate the utility of win statistics in comprehensively analyzing treatment effects in HF trials.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of pooled data from the DAPA-HF (n=4744) and DELIVER (n=6263) trials.
- Inclusion of patients with New York Heart Association class II-IV HF and specific ejection fraction criteria or cardiac biomarkers.
- Examination of a hierarchical composite outcome including cardiovascular death, total HF hospitalizations/visits, and KCCQ-TSS change at 8 months.
Main Results:
- The win ratio for the composite outcome was 1.30 in the pooled cohort, indicating a benefit for dapagliflozin.
- Win odds (1.19) and net benefit (8.7%) favored dapagliflozin in the overall patient population.
- Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Total Symptom Score (KCCQ-TSS) accounted for the majority of wins and losses (52.4%) in the pooled analysis.
Conclusions:
- Dapagliflozin demonstrated significant improvement in integrated composite outcomes in both DAPA-HF and DELIVER trials.
- The drug effectively addressed patient-reported outcomes alongside cardiovascular events and deaths.
- Win statistics provide a flexible and comprehensive approach to presenting treatment effects in heart failure.
More Related Videos
06:55Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
09:32Multiplexed Immunofluorescence Analysis and Quantification of Intratumoral PD-1+ Tim-3+ CD8+ T Cells
Published on: February 8, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups