Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2025

A Doxorubicin-Induced Murine Model of Dilated Cardiomyopathy In Vivo
Published on: May 16, 2020
Non-dilated left ventricular cardiomyopathy vs. dilated cardiomyopathy: clinical background and outcomes
Yuko Eda1, Takeru Nabeta1,2, Saeko Iikura1
1Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0374, Japan.
Insights
Non-dilated left ventricular cardiomyopathy with reduced ejection fraction (NDLVC-REF) showed similar cardiac event rates to dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). However, NDLVC-REF patients who developed left ventricular dilatation post-diagnosis faced poorer outcomes, necessitating close monitoring.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Heart Failure Research
Background:
- Non-dilated left ventricular cardiomyopathy (NDLVC) is a proposed cardiomyopathy category characterized by preserved left ventricular (LV) dimensions despite wall motion abnormalities or scar.
- The clinical profile and prognostic implications of NDLVC, particularly with reduced LV ejection fraction (NDLVC-REF), remained unclear compared to traditional dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM).
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the clinical characteristics and cardiac event rates of patients diagnosed with NDLVC and reduced LV ejection fraction (NDLVC-REF).
- To compare NDLVC-REF patients with those diagnosed with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM).
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 363 patients with newly diagnosed non-ischemic cardiomyopathy and reduced LV ejection fraction (<50%) from December 2004 to January 2018.
- Patients were categorized as NDLVC-REF (n=80) if LV dimension index was ≤31 mm/m² (men) or ≤34 mm/m² (women), and as DCM otherwise.
- Cardiac events included sudden cardiac death and heart failure rehospitalization; follow-up median was 68.8 months.
Main Results:
- NDLVC-REF patients exhibited a higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation and higher baseline LV ejection fraction compared to DCM patients.
- LV ejection fraction remained higher and LV end-diastolic diameter smaller in NDLVC-REF versus DCM throughout follow-up.
- No significant difference in cardiac event rates was observed between NDLVC-REF and DCM groups (P=0.349).
- A subset of NDLVC-REF patients (14%) who developed LV dilatation post-diagnosis showed a significantly higher risk of cardiac events (P=0.049).
Conclusions:
- NDLVC-REF and DCM share similar overall cardiac event rates, suggesting comparable long-term prognoses for these conditions.
- A significant proportion (18%) of NDLVC-REF patients experiencing LV dilatation after diagnosis had poor outcomes.
- Both NDLVC-REF and DCM patients warrant equivalent clinical attention, regular follow-up, and consistent assessment of LV function.
Aims:
Non-dilated left ventricular cardiomyopathy (NDLVC) was proposed as a new category of cardiomyopathy that included patients with non-left ventricular (LV) dilatation, LV wall motion abnormality, or LV scar. However, the clinical background and event rates of NDLVC were unclear. The aim of this study was to examine the characteristics and event rates of patients with NDLVC and reduced LV ejection fraction (NDLVC-REF) in comparison with those with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM).
Methods And Results:
We retrospectively included 363 patients with newly diagnosed non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy and reduced LV ejection fraction (<50%) between December 2004 and January 2018. Patients who did not have LV dilatation (LV dimension index of ≦31 mm/m2 in men and ≦34 mm/m2 in women) were categorized as NDLVC-REF (n = 80, 22.2%), and the remaining patients were categorized as DCM. Cardiac events were defined as sudden cardiac death and rehospitalization for heart failure. Patients with NDLVC-REF had a higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation and a higher LV ejection fraction than those with DCM at baseline. LV ejection fraction was higher and LV end-diastolic diameter was smaller in patients with NDLVC-REF than in those with DCM at all time points after diagnosis. During the median follow-up period of 68.8 months (interquartile range: 33.0-93.7 months), 44 patients experienced cardiac events. The Kaplan-Meier curves showed no significant differences in the probability of cardiac events among NDLVC-REF and DCM patients (P = 0.349). However, patients with NDLVC-REF and LV dilatation after diagnosis (14%) had a higher risk of cardiac events than those with NDLVC-REF without LV dilatation (P = 0.049).
Conclusions:
There was no significant difference in the incidence of cardiac events between NDLVC-REF and DCM. Among NDLVC-REF patients, 18% of patients who showed LV dilatation after diagnosis had poor outcomes. Therefore, both NDLVC-REF and DCM patients may require equivalent attention to follow-up and regular assessment of LV function.
Related Concept Videos
Imbalances in Cardiac Output
CHF can occur due to the failure of either side of the heart. Left-side failure leads to pulmonary congestion—the right side continues to send...
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure

