Microscopic extrathyroidal extension does not affect the prognosis of patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma: A...

Extrathyroidal extension (ETE) in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) can be divided into two categories based on different degrees of invasion: microscopic ETE (micro-ETE) and macroscopic ETE (macro-ETE). At present, there is a consensus that macro-ETE significantly affects PTC prognosis, while the prognostic significance of micro-ETE remains controversial.

The clinicopathological and follow-up data for PTC patients who underwent surgical treatment at the Hangzhou First People's Hospital between 2015 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the degree of ETE, patients were divided into three groups: non-ETE, micro-ETE and macro-ETE. Cox regression analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of ETE on recurrence-free survival (RFS). The propensity score matching (PSM) method was used to reduce the interference of confounding factors, and Kaplan-Meier curves were utilized to compare the RFS.

Both micro- and macro-ETE were associated with some aggressive tumor features, including tumor size, multifocality, and lymph node metastasis. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses showed that macro-ETE was an independent risk factor for recurrence, while micro-ETE was not associated with recurrence. The K-M curves showed that RFS for micro-ETE and non-ETE were not statistically different before and after PSM, while RFS for macro-ETE was significantly shorter than that for non-ETE.

The presence of micro-ETE in PTC did not affect prognosis of patients, suggesting that its treatment should be consistent with the treatment for intrathyroidal tumors. The surgical method and the necessity for radioiodine therapy should be carefully evaluated to reduce overtreatment.