Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 2, 2026
An Anatomical Study of Nerves at Risk During Minimally Invasive Hallux Valgus Surgery
Published on: February 17, 2018
First tarsometatarsal arthrodesis for severe hallux valgus using the tension band principle - Technical tip and case
Neil Limaye1, Tejas Kotwal1, Yousif Alkhalfan1
1Guy's and St Thomas Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Background:
Hallux valgus (HV) is a common foot pathology. Severe HV in the presence of Tarsometatarsal joint (TMTJ) instability is often managed with arthrodesis of the 1st TMTJ. There are concerns regarding non-union and malunion (particularly the early loss of inter-metatarsal angle correction before complete arthrodesis). We report our medium-term results of a small series of patients that underwent an evolved surgical technique utilising orthogonal staples and a transverse suture button fixation to address biomechanical concerns with traditional Lapidus arthrodesis.
Methods:
A retrospective study of a consecutive series of patients who underwent this surgical technique between February 2017 and May 2022. Clinical outcomes were validated through Patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMS); EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) and Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaires (MOXFQ). Radiographic parameters (hallux valgus (HVA), intermetatarsal (IMA), distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA)) were assessed. Union of the arthrodesis and complications were recorded.
Results:
During the study period, 9 feet underwent the procedure. Radiographic data was available for all nine and PROMS data for seven (77.8%). Significant improvement occurred in all radiographic deformity parameters at mean 6-month follow-up. Mean ± standard deviation correction calculated preoperatively as HVA 40.2°, IMA 19.3° and DMAA 15.8°, corrected to HVA 15.4°, IMA 5.8° and DMAA 5.9° postoperatively. (HVA; P < 0.001, IMA; P < 0.001, DMAA; P < 0.001) Clinical PROMs at mean follow-up of 2 years were MOXFQ 34.4 ± 25.2, EQ-5D-5 L 0.819 ± 0.150 and VAS pain 13.6 ± 13.6. There were no cases of non-union, Tibialis anterior tendon irritation or hallux varus. Complications included first MTPJ stiffness in one case and CRPS and dorsiflexion malunion of the first ray in another patient.
Conclusion:
This preliminary study of the procedure used in this series confirm this is a safe surgical technique to address severe HV with a low rate of non-union and significant radiographic improvements. A larger patient dataset is needed to evaluate this procedure robustly.
