Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2025

Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts
Published on: July 25, 2020
Comparative overall survival of CDK4/6 inhibitors in combination with endocrine therapy in advanced breast cancer
Coralea Kappel1, Mitchell J Elliott1, Vikaash Kumar1
1Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Abstract:
Individual trials of abemaciclib, palbociclib, and ribociclib show a similar impact on progression-free survival yet differing statistical significance for overall survival (OS). A robust comparative evaluation of OS, safety, and tolerability of the three drugs is warranted. A systematic literature search identified phase 3 randomized clinical trials reporting OS of CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) in combination with endocrine therapy in ER-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Trial-level data on OS and common and serious adverse events (AE) were extracted for each drug. In the absence of direct comparisons, a network meta-analysis was performed to evaluate pairwise comparative efficacy, safety, and tolerability of each of the CDK4/6i. Seven studies comprising of 4415 patients met the inclusion criteria. Median follow-up was 73.3 months (range: 48.7-97.2 months). There were no statistically significant differences in OS between any of the CDK4/6i. Compared to palbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib both showed significantly higher GI toxicity (grade 1-2 vomiting OR 1.87 [95% CI 1.37-2.56] and OR 2.27 [95% CI 1.59-3.23] respectively). Compared to palbociclib, abemaciclib was associated with more grade 3-4 diarrhea OR 118.06 [95% CI 7.28-1915.32]. In contrast, palbociclib was associated with significantly more neutropenia than ribociclib and abemaciclib but significantly lower risk of grade 3-4 infections. Abemaciclib had significantly less grade 3-4 transaminitis and grade 3-4 neutropenia than ribociclib. Treatment discontinuation and death due to AE were significantly higher with abemaciclib than palbociclib and ribociclib. There is no statistically significant difference in OS between CDK4/6i despite differing statistical significance levels of individual trials. Real-world data analyses may help to identify if there is a meaningful inter-drug difference in efficacy. Significant differences between CDK4/6i are observed for safety and tolerability outcomes.
Insights
No significant difference in overall survival (OS) was found between abemaciclib, palbociclib, and ribociclib in advanced breast cancer. However, significant differences in safety and tolerability were observed among these CDK4/6 inhibitors.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Abemaciclib, palbociclib, and ribociclib are CDK4/6 inhibitors used for ER-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer.
- Individual trials show similar progression-free survival but varying statistical significance for overall survival (OS).
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a robust comparative evaluation of the overall survival (OS), safety, and tolerability of abemaciclib, palbociclib, and ribociclib.
- To address the lack of direct comparative data for these CDK4/6 inhibitors in advanced breast cancer.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature search for Phase 3 randomized clinical trials of CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy.
- Network meta-analysis of trial-level data on OS and adverse events (AE) from seven studies (4415 patients).
Main Results:
- No statistically significant differences in OS were observed between any of the CDK4/6 inhibitors.
- Abemaciclib and ribociclib showed higher GI toxicity than palbociclib; abemaciclib had more severe diarrhea.
- Palbociclib was associated with more neutropenia but fewer grade 3-4 infections compared to the others. Abemaciclib had less transaminitis and neutropenia than ribociclib.
Conclusions:
- Despite no significant OS differences, substantial variations in safety and tolerability exist among CDK4/6 inhibitors.
- Abemaciclib demonstrated higher rates of treatment discontinuation and death due to AEs compared to palbociclib and ribociclib.
- Further real-world data analysis may reveal meaningful inter-drug efficacy differences.
More Related Videos
04:04Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Intratumoral Injection of Cisplatin for the Treatment of Isolated Mediastinal Recurrence of Lung Cancer
Published on: February 12, 2017
08:57Sample Extraction and Simultaneous Chromatographic Quantitation of Doxorubicin and Mitomycin C Following Drug Combination Delivery in Nanoparticles to Tumor-bearing Mice
Published on: October 5, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Inhibition of Cdk Activity
Cancer Survival Analysis
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups