Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A comprehensive psychometrics of cognitive ability measures: Reliability, practice effects, and the stability of latent factor structures across retesting.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same author

To what extent do cognitive abilities, conscientiousness, and physical activity predict academic performance?

Acta psychologica·2026
Same author

Quiet eyes: Visual gaze stability predicts intra- and interindividual differences in attention control.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2025
Same author

Setting specific goals improves cognitive effort, self-efficacy, and sustained attention.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2025
Same author

Individual differences in attention capture, control, and working memory.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2025
Same author

What makes working memory work? A multifaceted account of the predictive power of working memory capacity.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 4, 2025

Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment
07:01

Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment

Published on: September 20, 2020

4.7K

Pupillary correlates of individual differences in n-back task performance.

Matthew K Robison1, Lauren D Garner2

  • 1Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, USA. matthew.robison@uta.edu.

Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
|February 7, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Pupillometry reveals how attention intensity and consistency impact working memory. Task-evoked pupillary responses (TEPRs) and pupil variability predict performance on the 2-back task.

Keywords:
AttentionPupillometryWorking memory

More Related Videos

Assessing Pupil-linked Changes in Locus Coeruleus-mediated Arousal Elicited by Trigeminal Stimulation
07:26

Assessing Pupil-linked Changes in Locus Coeruleus-mediated Arousal Elicited by Trigeminal Stimulation

Published on: November 26, 2019

8.1K
Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

352

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 4, 2025

Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment
07:01

Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment

Published on: September 20, 2020

4.7K
Assessing Pupil-linked Changes in Locus Coeruleus-mediated Arousal Elicited by Trigeminal Stimulation
07:26

Assessing Pupil-linked Changes in Locus Coeruleus-mediated Arousal Elicited by Trigeminal Stimulation

Published on: November 26, 2019

8.1K
Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

352

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Psychology

Background:

  • Individual differences in attention significantly influence cognitive task performance.
  • Working memory relies on sustained and consistent attentional processes.
  • Pupillometry offers a non-invasive method to measure attentional dynamics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the roles of attentional intensity and consistency in working memory.
  • To examine how pupillometry metrics relate to performance on a 2-back task.
  • To understand individual differences in attention during cognitive load.

Main Methods:

  • Pupillometry was employed during a 2-back working memory task.
  • Task-evoked pupillary responses (TEPRs) measured attentional intensity.
  • Intraindividual pretrial pupil variability assessed attentional consistency.
  • Sensitivity was used as the primary measure of task performance.

Main Results:

  • TEPRs were significantly larger on target trials compared to non-target trials.
  • High performers exhibited greater TEPR separation between target and non-target trials.
  • Larger TEPRs on target trials predicted better performance, while on non-target trials, they predicted worse performance.
  • Sensitivity correlated positively with average pretrial pupil diameter and negatively with pretrial pupil variability.

Conclusions:

  • Both attentional intensity, indexed by TEPRs, and attentional consistency, measured by pupil variability, are crucial for working memory performance.
  • Pupillometry provides valuable insights into the neural and physiological underpinnings of attention and working memory.
  • Individual differences in attentional regulation strategies are reflected in pupillary responses during cognitive tasks.