Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Real-world evidence for coverage determination of treatments for rare diseases
Victoria W Dayer1, Michael F Drummond2, Omar Dabbous3
1CHOICE Institute, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA. vwinslow@uw.edu.
Abstract:
Health technology assessment (HTA) decisions for pharmaceuticals are complex and evolving. New rare disease treatments are often approved more quickly through accelerated approval schemes, creating more uncertainties about clinical evidence and budget impact at the time of market entry. The use of real-world evidence (RWE), including early coverage with evidence development, has been suggested as a means to support HTA decisions for rare disease treatments. However, the collection and use of RWE poses substantial challenges. These challenges are compounded when considered in the context of treatments for rare diseases. In this paper, we describe the methodological challenges to developing and using prospective and retrospective RWE for HTA decisions, for rare diseases in particular. We focus attention on key elements of study design and analyses, including patient selection and recruitment, appropriate adjustment for confounding and other sources of bias, outcome selection, and data quality monitoring. We conclude by offering suggestions to help address some of the most vexing challenges. The role of RWE in coverage and pricing determination will grow. It is, therefore, necessary for researchers, manufacturers, HTA agencies, and payers to ensure that rigorous and appropriate scientific principles are followed when using RWE as part of decision-making.
Insights
Real-world evidence (RWE) aids health technology assessment (HTA) for rare disease treatments, but faces significant methodological challenges. Addressing these is crucial for informed HTA decisions and effective market access.
Area of Science:
- Health Technology Assessment (HTA)
- Real-World Evidence (RWE)
- Rare Disease Therapeutics
Background:
- Health technology assessment (HTA) for pharmaceuticals is complex and evolving, particularly for rare disease treatments approved via accelerated pathways.
- Accelerated approval schemes for rare disease drugs create uncertainties regarding clinical evidence and budget impact upon market entry.
- Real-world evidence (RWE) is proposed to support HTA decisions for rare disease treatments, including through early coverage with evidence development.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe the methodological challenges in developing and utilizing prospective and retrospective RWE for HTA decisions concerning rare disease treatments.
- To focus on critical elements of study design and analysis for RWE generation in rare diseases.
Main Methods:
- Examination of methodological challenges in prospective and retrospective RWE development for HTA.
- Focus on key study design and analysis components: patient selection, confounding adjustment, bias control, outcome selection, and data quality monitoring.
- Exploration of challenges specific to RWE in the context of rare diseases.
Main Results:
- Significant methodological challenges exist in collecting and using RWE for HTA, especially for rare diseases.
- Key challenges identified include patient recruitment, confounding and bias adjustment, outcome selection, and data quality assurance.
- The paper outlines specific issues related to study design and analytical approaches for RWE in rare disease contexts.
Conclusions:
- Addressing the methodological challenges of RWE is essential for robust HTA decisions in rare diseases.
- The role of RWE in coverage and pricing determination is expected to increase.
- Researchers, manufacturers, HTA agencies, and payers must adhere to rigorous scientific principles when employing RWE in decision-making.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Cancer Survival Analysis
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...

