Assessing myocardial indices and inflammatory factors to determine anxiety and depression severity in patients with
Li Zhang1, Qiang Wang1, Hong-Sheng Cui1
1Department of Cardiology, Jingzhou Hospital, Yangtze University, Jingzhou 434020, Hubei Province, China.
Insights
Cardiac and inflammatory markers like LVEF, NT-proBNP, and IL-6 predict anxiety and depression severity in chronic heart failure patients. These biomarkers can help identify patients at risk for worsening symptoms and inform treatment strategies.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Psychiatry
- Biomarker Research
Background:
- Chronic heart failure (CHF) is linked to reduced quality of life and increased mortality.
- Anxiety and depression (A&D) symptoms are common in CHF patients and can worsen disease progression.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess cardiac and inflammatory markers in CHF patients.
- To determine the relationship between these markers and A&D severity.
- To evaluate the predictive value of these markers for A&D outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 233 CHF patients (2018-2022).
- Patients grouped by Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) scores.
- Comparison of clinical data, cardiac markers (e.g., LVEF, NT-proBNP), and inflammatory factors (e.g., IL-6) across A&D severity groups.
Main Results:
- NYHA class, LVEF, NT-proBNP, and IL-6 correlated with A&D severity (P < 0.05).
- LVEF, NT-proBNP, and IL-6 identified as independent risk factors for A&D severity.
- NT-proBNP showed the highest predictive ability as a single indicator (AUROC = 0.781); the combination of LVEF, NT-proBNP, and IL-6 achieved higher accuracy (AUROC = 0.875).
Conclusions:
- Cardiac (LVEF, NT-proBNP) and inflammatory (IL-6) biomarkers are significantly correlated with A&D severity in CHF.
- These biomarkers possess predictive value for assessing A&D severity in chronic heart failure patients.
Background:
Patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) have a progressive disease that is associated with poor quality of life and high mortality. Many patients experience anxiety and depression (A&D) symptoms, which can further accelerate disease progression. We hypothesized that indicators of myocardial function and inflammatory stress may reflect the severity of A&D symptoms in patients with CHF. Changes in these biomarkers could potentially predict whether A&D symptoms will deteriorate further in these individuals.
Aim:
To measure changes in cardiac and inflammatory markers in patients with CHF to determine A&D severity and predict outcomes.
Methods:
We retrospectively analyzed 233 patients with CHF treated at the Jingzhou Hospital, Yangtze University between 2018-2022 and grouped them according to Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) scores. We compared clinical data in the no-A&D, mild-A&D, moderate-A&D, and severe-A&D groups, the SAS and SDS scores with the New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification, and cardiac markers and inflammatory factors between the no/mild-A&D and moderate/severe-A&D groups. Regression analysis was performed on the markers with P < 0.05 to determine their ability to predict A&D severity in patients and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was used to evaluate their accuracy.
Results:
In the inter-group comparison, the following variables had an effect on A&D severity in patients with CHF: NYHA class, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (P < 0.05). Other variables did not differ significantly between the A&D groups (P > 0.05). In addition, we found that higher NYHA classes were associated with higher the SAS and SDS scores (P < 0.05). Regression analysis showed that LVEF, NT-proBNP, and IL-6 were independent risk factors for A&D severity (P < 0.05). Among them, NT-proBNP had the best predictive ability as a single indicator (AUROC = 0.781). Furthermore, the combination of these three indicators exhibited a good predictive effect toward discriminating the extent of A&D severity among patients (AUROC = 0.875).
Conclusion:
Cardiac and inflammatory biomarkers, such as LVEF, NT-proBNP, and IL-6, are correlated with A&D severity in patients with CHF and have predictive value.
More Related Videos
12:24Noninvasive Assessment of Cardiac Abnormalities in Experimental Autoimmune Myocarditis by Magnetic Resonance Microscopy Imaging in the Mouse
Published on: June 20, 2014
08:25Polar Histogram Visualization of Acute Stress Disorder Scale Scores for Comprehensive Clinical Assessment
Published on: December 6, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System II: CRP, Hcy, and Cardiac Natriuretic Peptide Markers
These markers indicate stress or strain on the heart muscle:
Natriuretic Peptides (BNP)
Cardiac myocytes produce these hormones in response to ventricular stretching...
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System I: Subjective Data
Initial Enquiry
Ask the patient about their primary concern and thoroughly explore all reported symptoms.
Medical History
Investigate past illnesses affecting the cardiovascular system, such as angina, anemia, rheumatic fever, congenital heart disease, stroke, thrombophlebitis, dysrhythmias, varicosities
Inquire about symptoms...
Psychoneuroimmunology: Cardiovascular Disease
A key area of focus in PNI is the relationship between stress and coronary...
Imbalances in Cardiac Output
CHF can occur due to the failure of either side of the heart. Left-side failure leads to pulmonary congestion—the right side continues to send...
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
