Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2025
X-ray Dose Reduction through Adaptive Exposure in Fluoroscopic Imaging
Published on: September 11, 2011
Image Correlation Between Digitally Reconstructed Radiographs, C-arm Fluoroscopic Radiographs, and X-ray: A Phantom
Sebastian Wangler1, Janic Hofmann1, Helen L Moser1
1Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, CHE.
Objective:
Digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) are planar two-dimensional (2D) X-rays derived from a three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) dataset. DRRs allow the simulation of radiographs of all desired views and facilitate preoperative planning. However, orthopedic surgeons rely on C-arm fluoroscopic imaging during surgery to verify fracture reduction and implant placement. Pincushion distortion represents a technical limitation of fluoroscopic imaging, resulting in a greater distance between points at the periphery of the image compared to the center. This project, therefore, aimed to assess the image correlation between digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) and fluoroscopic imaging (C-arm) using conventional radiographs (X-ray) as a control.
Methods:
A 3D-printed cubic prototype and an anatomical humerus bone model were used. C-arm fluoroscopic radiographs and conventional X-ray images were taken in an anteroposterior (AP) view at 10-degree steps while rotating the objects from 0 to 90 degrees. CT scans were made and used to compute and export DRRs in AP view at 10-degree rotational steps from 0 to 90 degrees. The surface area (cm2) was measured and compared between the different modalities. For automated image analysis of the anatomical humerus model, matching (%) between modalities was calculated using the structural similarity index (SSIM).
Results:
The overall regression was statistically significant in all models, with an R2 >0.99 when comparing all three imaging modalities of the prototype. Surface correlation in the anatomical humerus model was R2 0.99 between X-ray and C-arm and R2 0.95 between C-arm and X-ray to DRRs, respectively. The SSIM was highest for comparing DRR and C-arm images (0.84±0.01%).
Conclusions:
The study indicates a strong agreement between digitally reconstructed radiographs and X-ray/C-arm images. DRRs, therefore, represent a valuable tool for research and clinical application.
Related Concept Videos
01:24X-ray Imaging
01:20Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System III: X-Ray
Definition and Purpose
An X-ray, or radiograph, is a non-invasive method that uses ionizing radiation to take images of internal structures. It is mainly used in cardiac imaging to examine the heart, lungs, and major blood vessels, aiming to identify abnormalities in the heart's size, shape, and position, such as heart failure, congenital defects, and vascular...
01:10Computed Tomography
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
01:14Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
01:30Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT