Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2025

Single-Molecule Förster Resonance Energy Transfer Methods for Real-Time Investigation of the Holliday Junction Resolution by GEN1
Published on: September 18, 2019
The resolution of the weak-exchange limit made rigorous, simple and general in binuclear complexes
Dumitru-Claudiu Sergentu1,2,3, Boris Le Guennic1, Rémi Maurice1
1Univ Rennes, CNRS ISCR (Institut des Sciences Chimiques de Rennes) - UMR 6226, 35000 Rennes, France. remi.maurice@univ-rennes.fr.
Abstract:
The correct interpretation of magnetic properties in the weak-exchange regime has remained a challenging task for several decades. In this regime, the effective exchange interaction between local spins is quite weak, of the same order of magnitude or smaller than the various anisotropic terms, which generates a complex set of levels characterized by spin mixing. Although the model multispin Hamiltonian in the absence of local orbital momentum, , is considered good enough to map the experimental energies at zero field and in the strong-exchange limit, theoretical works pointed out limitations of this simple model. This work revives the use of ĤMS from a new theoretical perspective, detailing point-by-point a strategy to correctly map the computational energies and wave functions onto ĤMS, thus validating it regardless of the exchange limit. We will distinguish two cases, based on experimentally characterized dicobalt(II) complexes from the literature. If centrosymmetry imposes alignment of the various rank-2 tensors constitutive of ĤMS in the first case, the absence of any symmetry element prevents such alignment in the second case. In such a context, the strategy provided herein becomes a powerful tool to rationalize the experimental magnetic data, since it is capable of fully and rigorously extracting the multispin model without any assumption on the orientation of its constitutive tensors. Furthermore, the strategy allows to question the use of the spin Hamiltonian approach by explicitly controlling the projection norms on the model space, which is showcased in the second complex where local orbital momentum could have occurred (distorted octahedra). Finally, previous theoretical data related to a known dinickel(II) complex is reinterpreted, clarifying initial wanderings regarding the weak exchange limit.
More Related Videos
11:44Spin Saturation Transfer Difference NMR SSTD NMR: A New Tool to Obtain Kinetic Parameters of Chemical Exchange Processes
Published on: November 12, 2016
10:52Line Shape Analysis of Dynamic NMR Spectra for Characterizing Coordination Sphere Rearrangements at a Chiral Rhenium Polyhydride Complex
Published on: July 27, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Colors and Magnetism
When atoms or molecules absorb light at the proper frequency, their electrons are excited to higher-energy orbitals. For many main group atoms and molecules, the absorbed photons are in the ultraviolet range of the electromagnetic spectrum, which cannot be detected by the human eye. For coordination compounds, the energy difference between the d orbitals often allows photons in the visible range to be absorbed and emitted, which is seen as colors by the human...
Formation of Complex Ions
Nuclear Overhauser Enhancement (NOE)
Valence Bond Theory
Crystal Field Theory - Octahedral Complexes
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...