Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2025

08:18
Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Orbital Fractures
Published on: May 16, 2025
175
Patient-Specific Implant Customization for Treatment of Internal Orbital Fractures Using Office-Based
Joshua S Yoon1,2, Manaahil Rao1, Ryan Dunlow1
1Division of Plastic, Reconstructive and Maxillofacial Surgery, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Baltimore, MD.
The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
|February 8, 2024
Summary
Office-based 3D printing offers a cost-effective solution for reconstructing orbital volume in traumatic fractures. This workflow enables surgeons to efficiently design patient-specific implants, achieving satisfactory outcomes in complex cases.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical Engineering
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Three-dimensional (3D) modeling and printing are increasingly utilized in reconstructive surgery.
- Traditionally, 3D modeling and printing services for custom implants were outsourced.
- Incorporating these technologies into clinical practice offers potential for improved workflow and cost-efficiency.
Purpose of the Study:
- To present a standardized, low-cost, office-based workflow for restoring bony orbital volume in traumatic orbital fractures using 3D printing.
- To evaluate the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of an in-house 3D printing approach for custom orbital implants.
Main Methods:
- Patients with internal orbital fractures underwent open repair.
- Virtual 3D models were created using specialized software (iPlan 3.0 Cranial CMF).
- Office-based 3D printing was used to fabricate and modify orbital plates for precise fracture defect fitting. Postoperative CT scans and software were used for accuracy assessment.
Main Results:
- Nine patients (8 unilateral, 1 bilateral fractures) were included.
- Average image processing and printing times were 1.5 and 3 hours, respectively.
- The system cost $2500, with an average material cost of $2 per orbital model. Postoperative orbital volume differences were minimal (-0.2 ± 0.4 mL).
Conclusions:
- Office-based 3D printing is a viable, efficient, and cost-effective method for repairing internal orbital fractures.
- This workflow allows for the routine design of patient-specific implants with satisfactory clinical outcomes.
- The technology facilitates improved reconstructive surgery planning and execution in craniomaxillofacial practices.

