Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2026

Standardized Technique of Aortic Valve Re-implantation for Valve-sparing Aortic Root Replacement
Published on: December 11, 2017
Five-year outcomes in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease undergoing surgery or percutaneous
Szymon Jonik1, Shigetaka Kageyama2, Kai Ninomiya2
11st Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Banacha 1a Str, 01-267, Warsaw, Poland. szymonjonik.wum@gmail.com.
Insights
For severe coronary artery disease, both coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) show similar long-term survival. CABG reduces repeat revascularization, while PCI is associated with fewer strokes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
Background:
- Optimal revascularization strategy for multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD) remains under investigation.
- Real-world evidence on long-term outcomes comparing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare 5-year clinical outcomes and quality of life in patients with severe coronary artery disease (CAD) treated with CABG versus PCI.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of different revascularization strategies in a real-life clinical setting.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 1035 patients with severe CAD.
- Patients were treated with either CABG (356) or PCI (679) based on Heart Team recommendations.
- Assessment of 5-year primary and secondary endpoints, including mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), repeat revascularization (RR), and stroke.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in overall mortality or MI rates between CABG and PCI at 5 years.
- Higher rates of MACCE and RR in the PCI group compared to the CABG group (P < 0.01).
- CABG group experienced a higher incidence of stroke compared to the PCI group (P < 0.01).
Conclusions:
- In real-world practice, neither CABG nor PCI demonstrates overwhelming superiority for severe CAD at 5-year follow-up.
- Mortality and MI rates are comparable; CABG is associated with lower RR, whereas PCI is linked to fewer strokes.
Abstract:
The outcomes from real-life clinical studies regarding the optimal revascularization strategy in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD) are still poorly investigated. In this retrospective study we assessed 5-year outcomes: primary, secondary endpoints and quality of life of 1035 individuals with severe coronary artery disease (CAD) treated either with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)-356 patients or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-679 patients according to the recommendation of a local Heart Team (HT). At 5 years no significant difference in overall mortality and rates of myocardial infarctions (MI) were observed between CABG and PCI cohorts (11.0% vs. 13.4% for PCI, P = 0.27 and 9.6% vs. 12.8% for PCI, P = 0.12, respectively). The incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), mainly driven by increased rates of repeat revascularization (RR) were higher in PCI-cohort than in CABG-group (56.1% vs. 40.4%, P < 0.01 and 26.8% vs. 12.6%, P < 0.01, respectively), while CABG-patients experienced stroke more often (7.3% vs. 3.1% for PCI, P < 0.01). In real-life practice with long-term follow-up, none of the two revascularization modalities implemented following HT decisions showed overwhelming superiority: occurrence of death and MI were similar, rates of RR favoured CABG, while incidence of strokes advocated PCI.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management

