Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Interference and Decay01:16

Interference and Decay

141
Forgetting is a complex cognitive phenomenon influenced by several factors, among which interference and decay are particularly prominent. These processes explain why individuals often struggle to retrieve specific information from memory, leading to lapses in recall that can be observed in everyday situations.
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
141
Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

14.7K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

CLASP2 promotes repair of kinesin-1 damage to the microtubule lattice.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Preserving the Modiolus: Enhanced Functional and Aesthetic Restoration with the Modified Bernard-Webster Technique in Lip Reconstruction.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same author

DNA Nanobridge with Cascade Operation Logic on a Transistor for Comprehensive Evaluation of Respiratory Infection.

ACS applied materials & interfaces·2026
Same author

A Field-Portable Fe(IV)-Mediated Competitive Quenching Chemiluminescence Platform with a Synchronous Y-Shaped Flow-through Cell for Broad-Spectrum Quantification of Volatile Phenols.

Analytical chemistry·2026
Same author

Function and Mechanism of ZcucOBP14 in Regulating Olfactory Recognition and Insecticide Susceptibility in <i>Zeugodacus cucurbitae</i>.

International journal of molecular sciences·2026
Same author

Corrigendum to "Combination of andrographolide and baicalin inhibited influenza A virus infection through suppressing RORγt-IL-17A pathway" [Phytomedicine 156 (2026) 158277].

Phytomedicine : international journal of phytotherapy and phytopharmacology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 4, 2025

Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology
05:38

Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology

Published on: June 29, 2021

2.4K

Comparing two unitisation manipulations: effects on familiarity, recollection-based recognition, and semantic

Fan Zhou1, Yingjie Jiang1, Yang Yue1

  • 1School of Psychology, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, People's Republic of China.

Memory (Hove, England)
|February 9, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Unitisation encoding strategies impact associative memory recognition. Different tasks, like compound and imagery, affect familiarity and recollection differently, highlighting the importance of processing levels in memory research.

Keywords:
Episodic memoryfamiliarityrecollectionunitisation

More Related Videos

Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories
08:53

Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories

Published on: November 14, 2018

9.6K
The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition
05:15

The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

Published on: February 19, 2018

10.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 4, 2025

Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology
05:38

Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology

Published on: June 29, 2021

2.4K
Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories
08:53

Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories

Published on: November 14, 2018

9.6K
The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition
05:15

The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

Published on: February 19, 2018

10.8K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Memory Research

Background:

  • Unitisation is an encoding strategy influencing associative memory recognition.
  • Previous research shows distinctions between compound and imagery tasks in unitisation.
  • Discrepancies in findings suggest underlying differences in processing levels.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the hypothesis that varying levels of processing explain discrepancies between compound and imagery tasks.
  • To examine the effects of these tasks on familiarity and recollection.
  • To explore differences in semantic processing within the imagery task.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized the R/K paradigm to assess familiarity and recollection.
  • Employed an interference paradigm to analyze semantic processing.
  • Compared the compound task and the imagery task.

Main Results:

  • The compound task increased familiarity, while the imagery task increased recollection.
  • The imagery task showed a bias towards semantic lures over episodic lures.
  • The compound task did not significantly affect lure preference.

Conclusions:

  • Differences in semantic processing levels explain discrepancies in unitisation research.
  • The imagery task involves distinct levels of semantic processing compared to the compound task.
  • Careful selection of comparative methods is crucial for studying unitisation effects.