Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2025

DIPLOMA Approach for Standardized Pathology Assessment of Distal Pancreatectomy Specimens
Published on: February 1, 2020
Correlation between pathology and quantitative ultrasonographic evaluation of pancreatic fat with ultrasonographic
Naoki Matsumoto1, Mariko Kumagawa2, Kei Saito2
1Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, 30-1 Oyaguchi Kamimachi, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-8610, Japan. matsumotosg@yahoo.co.jp.
Purpose:
No studies of the relationship between grayscale sonographic findings and pancreatic fat content have been reported to date. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between echogenicity and fat content of resected specimens using quantitative analysis.
Methods:
Forty-two consecutive patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy or distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic tumors were enrolled in this study. Ultrasonographic images were compared with quantitative pathological analysis. Subjective evaluation of echogenicity was classified as hypoechoic, isoechoic, hyperechoic, and super hyperechoic. The total and intralobular fat areas were measured.
Results:
The mean, median, modal, minimum, and maximum ultrasound gray values correlated with the proportion of total fat area (r = 0.349; 0.357, 0.486, 0.466, and 0.347; p = 0.024, 0.020, 0.014, 0.019, and 0.089, respectively), but did not correlate with the proportion of intralobular fat area. Subjective classification was correlated with median gray value (p < 0.001), intralobular fat area (p = 0.118), and total fat area (p = 0.011). Cases were classified as hypoechoic (n = 3), isoechoic (n = 7), hyperechoic (n = 30), and super hyperechoic (n = 2). The subjective classification was correlated with the median gray value (p < 0.001) and total fat area (p = 0.005), and not correlated with the intralobular fat area (p = 0.118). Hyperechoic or super hyperechoic pancreatic parenchyma contains over 19.7% fat. Computed tomography values correlated with the proportion of intralobular fat area (r = - 0.479, p = 0.004) and total fat area (r = - 0.541, p < 0.001).
Conclusion:
Echogenicity classified based on subjective evaluation and image analysis were correlated with the proportion of fat in the pancreas.
Related Concept Videos
Ultrasound II: Endoscopic Ultrasound and FibroScan
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS):
Ultrasonography
During an ultrasonography procedure, a handheld device called...

