Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2025
Quantification of Tumor Cell Adhesion in Lymph Node Cryosections
Published on: February 9, 2020
Optimal Extent of Neck Dissection for a Head and Neck Lymph Node Metastasis from a Remote Primary Site
Han Wool John Sung1, Hyo One Son1, Da Beom Heo1
1Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon 35015, Republic of Korea.
Background:
Despite its rarity and limited documentation, therapeutic neck dissection (ND) for cervical lymph node (LN) metastases from distant primary sites is increasingly practiced, potentially enhancing survival rates. However, the optimal ND extent remains unclear. This study aimed to determine the safety of excluding upper neck levels from ND.
Methods:
We retrospectively analyzed 25 patients who underwent ND for cervical LN metastases from remote primary tumors between 2015 and 2021 (12 with primary lung tumors, four with ovary, three with mammary gland, three with esophagus, two with thymus, and one with colon).
Results:
Assessing clinical characteristics and occult metastasis rates, we observed LN metastases predominantly at levels III and IV. Occult metastases occurred in 14 out of 25 patients, primarily at neck levels III and IV (55.0% and 50.0%, respectively). The five-year disease-specific survival rate for all patients was 44.3%. While no statistically significant impact of occult metastasis on prognosis was confirmed, an association between the postoperative LN ratio and poor prognosis was revealed.
Conclusions:
Our findings suggest that prophylactic NDs at levels I, II, and Va may not be essential for managing cervical LN metastases from remote primary malignancies. This could lead to a more tailored and less invasive therapeutic strategy.
