Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Imaging Studies III: Gastrointestinal Motility Studies and Virtual Colonoscopy01:26

Imaging Studies III: Gastrointestinal Motility Studies and Virtual Colonoscopy

85
This lesson explores three gastrointestinal imaging techniques: radionuclide testing, colonic transit studies, and virtual colonoscopy.
Radionuclide Testing
Radionuclide testing is a sophisticated medical technique for assessing gastrointestinal motility. It focuses on gastric emptying and colonic transit time. Radioactive markers track the movement of food through the digestive system, providing insights into gastrointestinal disorders.
In gastric emptying studies, a meal's liquid and...
85
Serum Laboratory Studies, Stool Test, Breath Test01:30

Serum Laboratory Studies, Stool Test, Breath Test

348
Gastrointestinal (GI) diagnostic studies are pivotal in confirming, ruling out, diagnosing, or staging various diseases, including cancers. Following diagnosis, allocating time for discussions with the patient and providing informational resources is crucial. Diagnostic assessments of the GI tract often occur in outpatient settings like endoscopy suites or GI labs. Preparation for these tests may include dietary restrictions, fasting, liquid bowel preparations, laxatives, enemas, and the...
348
Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy01:25

Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy

97
The colon, or large intestine, is the final segment of the digestive system. Its primary functions include absorbing water and vitamins produced by gut bacteria and transforming waste from liquid to solid to form stool. In adults, the large intestine is approximately 5 feet long and consists of four main sections:
97
Lower GI Series: Barium Enema01:23

Lower GI Series: Barium Enema

270
A Barium Enema, or a lower GI series, is a specialized radiographic examination designed to visualize the lower gastrointestinal tract, specifically the colon and rectum. This procedure is instrumental in diagnosing various conditions such as colorectal cancer, polyps, diverticulosis, and inflammatory bowel disease.
Procedure Details
The examination begins by inserting a lubricated rectal tube into the patient's rectum to administer a radiopaque barium solution. The barium flow is carefully...
270
Inflammatory Bowel Disease III: Diagnostic Studies and Management I-Nutritional Therapy01:30

Inflammatory Bowel Disease III: Diagnostic Studies and Management I-Nutritional Therapy

334
Various diagnostic tests are employed in the diagnostic process for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD), particularly to differentiate between Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis.
Diagnostic studies
A colonoscopy is the definitive screening test, distinguishing ulcerative colitis from other colon diseases with similar symptoms. During a colonoscopy test, inflamed mucosa with exudate ulcerations can be observed, and biopsies are taken to determine the histologic characteristics of the...
334
Immunocytochemistry and Immunohistochemistry01:22

Immunocytochemistry and Immunohistochemistry

11.3K
Immunocytochemistry (ICC) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) are techniques that use antibodies to check for specific proteins or antigens in a sample. The technique was first published by Albert Coons in 1941 to detect the presence of pneumococcal antigen in tissue sections from mice infected with Pneumococcus. Immunocytochemistry helps localization of proteins or antigens in individual cells like blood cells, stem cells, etc., while immunohistochemistry does the same for tissue samples.
These...
11.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

No-cost envelope modification improves fecal immunochemical test laboratory acceptance in a US Veterans Affairs colorectal cancer screening trial.

Journal of medical screening·2026
Same author

Mixed-Methods Development and Validation of PRO/PREM Items for Patients Undergoing Colon Polyp Surveillance.

Journal of clinical gastroenterology·2026
Same author

Colorectal Cancer and Mortality Risk Among Older Adults With vs Without Adenoma on Prior Colonoscopy.

JAMA·2026
Same author

Is a Goldilocks Solution for Colorectal Cancer Screening Just a Fairy Tale? Overdiagnosis Versus Later Diagnosis of Premalignant Lesions.

Gastroenterology·2026
Same author

Association Between Adenoma Detection Rate and Prevalent Colorectal Cancer Detection Rate in a National Colonoscopy Registry.

Gastroenterology·2025
Same author

Clinical Validation of a Circulating Tumor DNA-Based Blood Test to Screen for Colorectal Cancer.

JAMA·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 3, 2025

Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer Risk and Prevalence by Stool DNA Integrity Detection
07:35

Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer Risk and Prevalence by Stool DNA Integrity Detection

Published on: June 8, 2020

6.9K

Colonoscopy vs the Fecal Immunochemical Test: Which is Best?

Douglas J Robertson1, Douglas K Rex2, Oriana Ciani3

  • 1VA Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont; Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire.

Gastroenterology
|February 11, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Choosing the best colorectal cancer screening method is key. This review compares colonoscopy and fecal immunochemical testing (FIT), examining their effectiveness and cost-efficiency for cancer prevention.

Keywords:
ColonoscopyColorectal Cancer ScreeningFecal Immunochemical TestHealth Economics

More Related Videos

Fecal Microbiota Transplantation via Colonoscopy for Recurrent C. difficile Infection
07:06

Fecal Microbiota Transplantation via Colonoscopy for Recurrent C. difficile Infection

Published on: December 8, 2014

27.1K
Comparative Analysis of Automatic Fecal Analyzer versus Direct Wet Smear Microscopy for Detecting Parasitic Infections in Stool Samples
04:57

Comparative Analysis of Automatic Fecal Analyzer versus Direct Wet Smear Microscopy for Detecting Parasitic Infections in Stool Samples

Published on: April 25, 2025

405

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 3, 2025

Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer Risk and Prevalence by Stool DNA Integrity Detection
07:35

Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer Risk and Prevalence by Stool DNA Integrity Detection

Published on: June 8, 2020

6.9K
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation via Colonoscopy for Recurrent C. difficile Infection
07:06

Fecal Microbiota Transplantation via Colonoscopy for Recurrent C. difficile Infection

Published on: December 8, 2014

27.1K
Comparative Analysis of Automatic Fecal Analyzer versus Direct Wet Smear Microscopy for Detecting Parasitic Infections in Stool Samples
04:57

Comparative Analysis of Automatic Fecal Analyzer versus Direct Wet Smear Microscopy for Detecting Parasitic Infections in Stool Samples

Published on: April 25, 2025

405

Area of Science:

  • Gastroenterology
  • Preventive Medicine
  • Health Economics

Background:

  • Colorectal cancer screening effectively reduces disease burden.
  • Guidelines offer multiple screening options, including colonoscopy and fecal immunochemical testing (FIT).
  • Comparative effectiveness trials are ongoing, but results are not yet available.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present the "best case" for FIT and colonoscopy as primary screening tools.
  • To analyze screening modalities from a health economics perspective.
  • To provide context on the relative advantages of commonly used colorectal cancer tests.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review of existing literature.
  • Comparative analysis of colonoscopy and FIT.
  • Health economic evaluation of screening strategies.

Main Results:

  • Colonoscopy offers high sensitivity for detecting colorectal cancer and polyps.
  • FIT provides a non-invasive, cost-effective option for initial screening.
  • Data from large-scale comparative trials are pending.

Conclusions:

  • Both colonoscopy and FIT are effective screening modalities for colorectal cancer.
  • The optimal choice depends on individual patient factors, cost-effectiveness, and resource availability.
  • Further research and comparative data are needed to definitively establish the most effective and cost-effective screening strategy.