Differential cardiopulmonary haemodynamic phenotypes in PASC-related exercise intolerance
Peter A Kahn1, Phillip Joseph1, Paul M Heerdt2
1Yale School of Medicine, Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Background:
Post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) affect a significant proportion of patients who have previously contracted SARS-CoV-2, with exertional intolerance being a prominent symptom. This study aimed to characterise the invasive haemodynamic abnormalities of PASC-related exertional intolerance using invasive cardiopulmonary exercise testing (iCPET).
Study Design And Intervention:
55 patients were recruited from the Yale Post-COVID-19 Recovery Program, with most experiencing mild acute illness. Supine right heart catheterisation and iCPET were performed on all participants.
Main Results:
The majority (75%) of PASC patients exhibited impaired peak systemic oxygen extraction (pEO2) during iCPET in conjunction with supranormal cardiac output (CO) (i.e., PASC alone group). On average, the PASC alone group exhibited a "normal" peak exercise capacity, V'O (89±18% predicted). ∼25% of patients had evidence of central cardiopulmonary pathology (i.e., 12 with resting and exercise heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and two with exercise pulmonary hypertension (PH)). PASC patients with HFpEF (i.e., PASC HFpEF group) exhibited similarly impaired pEO2 with well compensated PH (i.e., peak V'O and CO >80% respectively) despite aberrant central cardiopulmonary exercise haemodynamics. PASC patients with HFpEF also exhibited increased body mass index of 39±7 kg·m-2. To examine the relative contribution of obesity to exertional impairment in PASC HFpEF, a control group comprising obese non-PASC group (n=61) derived from a historical iCPET cohort was used. The non-PASC obese patients with preserved peak V'O (>80% predicted) exhibited a normal peak pulmonary artery wedge pressure (17±14 versus 25±6 mmHg; p=0.03) with similar maximal voluntary ventilation (90±12 versus 86±10% predicted; p=0.53) compared to PASC HFpEF patients. Impaired pEO2 was not significantly different between PASC patients who underwent supervised rehabilitation and those who did not (p=0.19).
Conclusions:
This study highlights the importance of considering impaired pEO2 in PASC patients with persistent exertional intolerance unexplained by conventional investigative testing. Results of the current study also highlight the prevalence of a distinct high output HFpEF phenotype in PASC with a primary peripheral limitation to exercise.
More Related Videos
09:33Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Wearable Devices to Identify Central Versus Peripheral Limitations During Exercise
Published on: December 19, 2024
08:44Author Spotlight: Integrating Alveolar-Capillary Reserve Measurements in Exercise Adaptation and Therapeutic Strategies
Published on: February 2, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Imbalances in Cardiac Output
CHF can occur due to the failure of either side of the heart. Left-side failure leads to pulmonary congestion—the right side continues to send...
