Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2026

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
Published on: December 5, 2014
Why is a flamingo named as pelican and asparagus as celery? Understanding the relationship between targets and errors
Leonie F Lampe1,2, Maria Zarifyan1,3, Solène Hameau1,4
1School of Psychological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Abstract:
Speakers sometimes make word production errors, such as mistakenly saying pelican instead of flamingo. This study explored which properties of an error influence the likelihood of its selection over the target word. Analysing real-word errors in speeded picture naming, we investigated whether, relative to the target, naming errors were more typical representatives of the semantic category, were associated with more semantic features, and/or were semantically more closely related to the target than its near semantic neighbours were on average. Results indicated that naming errors tended to be more typical category representatives and possess more semantic features than the targets. Moreover, while not being the closest semantic neighbours, errors were largely near semantic neighbours of the targets. These findings suggest that typicality, number of semantic features, and semantic similarity govern activation levels in the production system, and we discuss possible mechanisms underlying these effects in the context of word production theories.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Visual Agnosia
Concepts and Prototypes
The brain organizes this information using concepts, which are mental categories grouping linguistic data,...
Tip-of-the-Tongue Phenomenon

