Differential Responses to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors are Governed by Diverse Mismatch Repair Gene Alterations

Moh'd M Khushman1, Michael D Toboni2, Joanne Xiu3

  • 1Washington University in St. Louis/Siteman Cancer Center, St. Louis, Missouri.

Abstract

Insights

Patients with mutS co-loss alterations in colorectal and endometrial cancers show improved survival and better response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Neoantigen load (NAL) may drive these outcomes, as tumor mutation burden (TMB) did not reliably predict NAL.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Immunotherapy
  • Genomics

Background:

  • Response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) colorectal and endometrial cancers is variable.
  • Understanding differential responses based on specific mismatch repair alterations is crucial for optimizing treatment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the differential response to ICIs in dMMR colorectal and endometrial cancers based on distinct mismatch repair alterations.
  • To explore the association between specific mismatch repair gene co-loss (mutS vs. mutL) and clinical outcomes, including overall survival and neoantigen load.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of 13,701 colorectal cancer and 3,315 endometrial cancer specimens.
  • Estimation of median overall survival (mOS) using Kaplan-Meier analysis.
  • Assessment of neoantigen load (NAL) and prediction of epitopes by tumor mutation burden (TMB) using R-squared values.

Main Results:

  • MutS (MSH2/MSH6) co-loss was associated with significantly longer mOS compared to MutL (MLH1/PMS2) co-loss in both colorectal (54.6 vs. 36 months) and endometrial cancers (81.5 vs. 48.2 months).
  • In ICI-treated patients, MutS co-loss correlated with longer mOS in colorectal cancer (NR vs. 36 months).
  • Higher NAL was observed in MutS co-loss compared to MutL co-loss across both cancer types, suggesting NAL as a potential driver of improved outcomes. TMB did not reliably predict NAL.

Conclusions:

  • MutS co-loss is linked to superior overall survival and enhanced response to ICIs in colorectal cancer.
  • Neoantigen load (NAL) appears to be a key factor contributing to better outcomes in patients with MutS co-loss.
  • Tumor mutation burden (TMB) is not a reliable predictor of NAL in this context.

Related Concept Videos

Mismatch Repair01:20

Mismatch Repair

Organisms are capable of detecting and fixing nucleotide mismatches that occur during DNA replication. This sophisticated process requires identifying the new strand and replacing the erroneous bases with correct nucleotides. Mismatch repair is coordinated by many proteins in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes.
The Mutator Protein Family Plays a Key Role in DNA Mismatch Repair
The human genome has more than 3 billion base pairs of DNA per cell. Prior to cell division, that vast amount of genetic...
4.8K
Abnormal Proliferation02:23

Abnormal Proliferation

Under normal conditions, most adult cells remain in a non-proliferative state unless stimulated by internal or external factors to replace lost cells. Abnormal cell proliferation is a condition in which the cell's growth exceeds and is uncoordinated with normal cells. In such situations, cell division persists in the same excessive manner even after cessation of the stimuli, leading to persistent tumors. The tumor arises from the damaged cells that replicate to pass the damage to the...
4.5K
DNA Damage can Stall the Cell Cycle02:37

DNA Damage can Stall the Cell Cycle

In response to DNA damage, cells can pause the cell cycle to assess and repair the breaks. However, the cell must check the DNA at certain critical stages during the cell cycle. If the cell cycle pauses before DNA replication, the cells will contain twice the amount of DNA. On the other hand, if cells arrest after DNA replication but before mitosis, they will contain four times the normal amount of DNA. With a host of specialized proteins at their disposal,cells must use the right protein at...
9.2K
Long-patch Base Excision Repair01:02

Long-patch Base Excision Repair

Since the discovery of the two BER pathways, there has been a debate about how a cell chooses one pathway over the other and the factors determining this selection. Numerous in vitro experiments have pointed out multiple determinants for the sub-pathway selection. These are:
7.0K
Interactions Between Signaling Pathways01:19

Interactions Between Signaling Pathways

Signaling cascades usually lack linearity. Multiple pathways interact and regulate one another, allowing cells to integrate and respond to diverse environmental stimuli.
Convergence and divergence, and cross-talk between signaling pathways
Two distinct signaling pathways can converge on a single functional unit, which may either be a single protein or a complex of proteins. The response is either functionally distinct or synergistic between the two pathways but different from the response...
6.3K