Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 3, 2025

A Murine Model of Stent Implantation in the Carotid Artery for the Study of Restenosis
Published on: May 14, 2013
The Effects of Clopidogrel Duration on Carotid Artery In-Stent Restenosis
Trung Nguyen1, Christine Jokisch1, Chetan Dargan1
1Division of Vascular Surgery, University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa, FL.
Insights
Short-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after carotid artery stenting (CAS) showed no significant difference in restenosis rates compared to long-term DAPT. Patients may benefit from shorter DAPT durations if no other indications exist.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Interventional Cardiology
- Clinical Evidence Synthesis
Background:
- Limited data exist on optimal dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) duration post-carotid artery stenting (CAS).
- Current evidence often extrapolates from coronary intervention studies.
- The impact of DAPT duration on carotid in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between DAPT duration and the incidence of ISR after CAS.
- To determine if shorter DAPT durations are associated with increased ISR rates.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 279 patients undergoing CAS between 1996-2016.
- Patients categorized into short-term (<6 weeks) and long-term (>6 weeks) clopidogrel therapy groups.
- In-stent restenosis defined by peak systolic velocity criteria; rates analyzed at 1, 2, and 5 years.
Main Results:
- No statistically significant difference in overall ISR rates between short-term (5.03%) and long-term (9.24%) clopidogrel users within 5 years (P=0.168).
- Similar non-significant findings observed at 1-year (P=0.321), 2-year (P=0.072), and 5-year (P=0.635) follow-up intervals.
- Demographic differences noted, with short-term users more likely to have atrial fibrillation and less likely to have prior coronary artery bypass graft, diabetes, or coronary artery disease.
Conclusions:
- DAPT duration (short-term vs. long-term) did not significantly impact ISR rates after CAS.
- Shorter DAPT durations may be considered for patients without other compelling indications for extended therapy post-CAS.
Background:
There are limited data supporting a specific duration for dual antiplatelet therapy in carotid artery stenting (CAS), and most clinical evidence is derived from studies involving coronary interventions. As a result, the appropriate duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after CAS is yet to be determined. We aimed to elucidate whether the duration of dual antiplatelet therapy played a role in the rate of carotid in-stent restenosis.
Methods:
A retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent CAS at our institution over a 20-year period (1996-2016) was performed (n = 279). Patients who did not complete their follow-up duplex studies or were not discharged on clopidogrel were excluded from the study. Patients were separated into short-term (<6 weeks, n = 159) and long-term (>6 weeks, n = 112) clopidogrel users based on duration of therapy. We defined clinically significant in-stent restenosis as >50% restenosis (peak systolic velocity = 224 cm/s) in symptomatic patients and >80% restenosis (peak systolic velocity = 325 cm/s) in asymptomatic patients status-post prior CAS based on published velocity criteria. Rates of in-stent restenosis at 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year intervals were analyzed between the 2 groups using chi-squared analysis.
Results:
Demographic information was largely similar between the 2 groups; however, short-term clopidogrel users were more likely to have a history of atrial fibrillation (9.43% vs. 1.68%, P = 0.008) and were less likely to have a history of coronary artery bypass graft (16.35% vs. 29.41%, P = 0.009), diabetes (33.34% vs. 49.58%, P = 0.006), and coronary artery disease (50.31% vs. 63.03%, P = 0.035). All patients were on long-term aspirin therapy. There was no significant difference between overall rates of in-stent restenosis between the short-term and long-term clopidogrel users (5.03% vs. 9.24%, P = 0.168) within 5 years of the index procedure. Similar results were observed when these groups were evaluated at 1-year (5.61% vs. 3%, P = 0.321), 2-year (2.02% vs. 6.59%, P = 0.072), and 5-year (2.24% vs. 3.57%, P = 0.635) follow-up.
Conclusions:
No statistically significant difference was observed in the rate of in-stent restenosis after CAS between short-term and long-term clopidogrel therapy. Patients in whom there is no other indication for longer duration clopidogrel therapy may be considered for shorter duration course of dual antiplatelet therapy following CAS.
Related Concept Videos
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...
Time Course of Drug Effect

