Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 29, 2026

Stem Cell Transplantation in an in vitro Simulated Ischemia/Reperfusion Model
Published on: November 5, 2011
Cryopreservation-induced delayed injury and cell-type-specific responses during the cryopreservation of endothelial
MingHan Yu1, Leah A Marquez-Curtis1, Janet A W Elliott1
1Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 1H9, Canada; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 1C9, Canada.
Abstract:
The cryopreservation of endothelial cell monolayers is an important step that bridges the cryopreservation of cells in suspension to that of tissues. Previous studies have identified clear distinctions in freezing mechanisms between cells in suspension and in monolayers, as well as developed novel protocols for monolayer cryopreservation. Recently, our group has shown that human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) and porcine corneal endothelial cell (PCEC) monolayers grown on Rinzl plastic substrate can be cryopreserved in 5% dimethyl sulfoxide, 6% hydroxyethyl starch, and 2% chondroitin sulfate, following a slow-cooling protocol (-1 °C/min) with rapid plunge into liquid nitrogen from -40 °C. However, membrane integrity assessments were done immediately post thaw, which may result in an overestimation of cell viability due to possible delayed injury responses. Here, we show that for the optimal protocol condition of plunge at the -40 °C interrupt temperature, HUVEC and PCEC monolayers exhibited no significant immediate post-thaw injuries nor delayed injury responses during the 24-h post-thaw overnight culture period. HUVEC monolayers experienced no significant impact to their natural growth rate during the post-thaw culture, while PCEC monolayers experienced significantly higher growth than the unfrozen controls. The difference in the low-temperature responses between HUVEC and PCEC monolayers was further shown under high temperature plunge conditions. At these suboptimal plunge temperatures, HUVEC monolayers exhibited moderate immediate membrane injury but a pronounced delayed injury response during the 24-h post-thaw culture, while PCEC monolayers showed significant immediate membrane injury but no additional delayed injury response during the same period. Therefore, we provide further validation of our group's previously designed endothelial monolayer cryopreservation protocol for HUVEC and PCEC monolayers, and we identify several cell-type-specific responses to the freezing process.
More Related Videos
08:22In vitro Assessment of Myocardial Protection following Hypothermia-Preconditioning in a Human Cardiac Myocytes Model
Published on: October 27, 2020
04:10Author Spotlight: Preservation of Bioenergetic Parameters in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells After Cryopreservation
Published on: October 20, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Responses to Heat and Cold Stress
Overview Of Cell Separation And Isolation
Principles of Food Preservation
Methods of Controlling Food Spoilage
Cellular Injury I: Introduction
Secondary Spinal Cord Injury llI: Pathophysiology