Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Quantitative Analysis01:12

Quantitative Analysis

302
Quantitative analysis is a technique for measuring the amount of specific constituents in a sample. When the sample's composition is unknown, qualitative analysis is performed first to identify its components, which ensures that the correct substances are measured during the quantitative phase.
In quantitative analysis, two key measurements are made: the sample quantity and a property proportional to the amount of the analyte (the substance being analyzed). This forms the basis of the...
302
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

6.6K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
6.6K
Qualitative Analysis01:10

Qualitative Analysis

259
Qualitative analysis is the process of identifying elements, ions, or compounds in an unknown sample. It is the first and most fundamental type of analysis based on the hierarchy of analytical goals. This hierarchy is significant as it provides a structured approach to scientific research, with qualitative analysis serving as the initial step, providing essential information before moving on to quantitative or other forms of analysis.
There are two main approaches to qualitative analysis:...
259
Cochran's Q Test01:17

Cochran's Q Test

331
Cochran's Q Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there are potential differences in the outcomes of three or more related groups on a binary (yes/no) or dichotomous outcome. It is essentially an extension of the McNemar Test, which is limited to two related samples - Cochran's Q test can handle three or more related samples, making it more versatile in scenarios where subjects are measured under multiple conditions. The test statistic follows a Chi-Square...
331
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

100
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
100
Variability: Analysis01:11

Variability: Analysis

143
Measures of variability are statistical metrics that reveal the dispersion pattern within a dataset. They are pivotal in biostatistics, providing insights into the heterogeneity within health and biological data. Variability signifies the degree to which data points diverge from one another, helping researchers understand the potential range of values and associated uncertainty within the data.
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
143

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Conservative treatments for chronic non-specific low back pain: time course network meta-analysis.

BMJ medicine·2026
Same author

Treatments for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a pathways pilot with systematic review, evidence synthesis and economic model.

Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)·2026
Same author

Lifetime Physical Loading and Magnetic Resonance-Derived Intervertebral Disc Health in Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Cross-Sectional Study.

JOR spine·2026
Same author

Reducing Post-Fall Emergency Department Transfer From Residential Aged Care Homes: The Falls Outreach and Residential Mobile Assessment Team (FORMAT) Before-and-After Study.

Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA·2026
Same author

Placebo and nocebo responses in gabapentin enacarbil and pregabalin trials for restless legs syndrome: time-course model-based network meta-analysis and meta-analysis of proportions.

Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung·2026
Same author

Effect of monotherapy with conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs or glucocorticoids on radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis: a network meta-analysis of 64 treatment arms from 31 randomized controlled trials.

Scandinavian journal of rheumatology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 3, 2025

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.5K

Contextual effects: how to, and how not to, quantify them.

Tobias Saueressig1,2, Hugo Pedder3, Patrick J Owen4

  • 1Department of Applied Health Sciences, Division of Physiotherapy, Hochschule für Gesundheit (University of Applied Sciences), Gesundheitscampus 6-8, 44801, Bochum, Germany. t.saueressig@physiomeetsscience.com.

BMC Medical Research Methodology
|February 13, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Contextual effects in clinical care are debated. This study proposes comparing placebo and no-treatment groups to accurately measure these effects, offering guidance for better clinical research practices.

Keywords:
Contextual effectsMeta-analysisMethodologyPlacebo effects

More Related Videos

The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition
05:15

The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

Published on: February 19, 2018

10.8K
Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

15.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 3, 2025

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.5K
The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition
05:15

The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

Published on: February 19, 2018

10.8K
Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

15.7K

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Research Methodology
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Psychosomatic Medicine

Background:

  • The role and magnitude of contextual effects in clinical care remain controversial.
  • Previous reviews have yielded conflicting conclusions regarding placebo intervention efficacy.
  • Methodological limitations in quantifying contextual effects contribute to discrepancies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate methods for estimating contextual effects in clinical research.
  • To propose an optimal methodology for quantifying contextual effects.
  • To provide clear guidance on best practices for estimating contextual effects.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of existing systematic reviews and methodologies for quantifying contextual effects.
  • Comparison of different approaches, including placebo control arms and proportional contextual effects.
  • Proposal of a novel method: difference between placebo and non-treated control groups.

Main Results:

  • The Cochrane review (2010) underestimated contextual effects due to flawed quantification methods.
  • Post-2010 reviews suggest larger contextual effects, often stemming from inappropriate analytical techniques.
  • Solely using placebo control arms or calculating 'proportional contextual effects' are identified as limited methods.

Conclusions:

  • Accurate estimation of contextual effects is crucial for understanding the total treatment effect.
  • The proposed method of comparing placebo to non-treated groups offers a more robust quantification.
  • Implementing standardized best practices will improve the reliability of clinical trial results.