Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 3, 2025

Patient-Derived Tumor Explants As a "Live" Preclinical Platform for Predicting Drug Resistance in Patients
Published on: February 7, 2021
Biomarker-directed targeted therapy plus durvalumab in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase 2 umbrella trial
Benjamin Besse1, Elvire Pons-Tostivint2, Keunchil Park3,4
1Institut Gustave Roussy, Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France.
Abstract:
For patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumors without currently targetable molecular alterations, standard-of-care treatment is immunotherapy with anti-PD-(L)1 checkpoint inhibitors, alone or with platinum-doublet therapy. However, not all patients derive durable benefit and resistance to immune checkpoint blockade is common. Understanding mechanisms of resistance-which can include defects in DNA damage response and repair pathways, alterations or functional mutations in STK11/LKB1, alterations in antigen-presentation pathways, and immunosuppressive cellular subsets within the tumor microenvironment-and developing effective therapies to overcome them, remains an unmet need. Here the phase 2 umbrella HUDSON study evaluated rational combination regimens for advanced NSCLC following failure of anti-PD-(L)1-containing immunotherapy and platinum-doublet therapy. A total of 268 patients received durvalumab (anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody)-ceralasertib (ATR kinase inhibitor), durvalumab-olaparib (PARP inhibitor), durvalumab-danvatirsen (STAT3 antisense oligonucleotide) or durvalumab-oleclumab (anti-CD73 monoclonal antibody). Greatest clinical benefit was observed with durvalumab-ceralasertib; objective response rate (primary outcome) was 13.9% (11/79) versus 2.6% (5/189) with other regimens, pooled, median progression-free survival (secondary outcome) was 5.8 (80% confidence interval 4.6-7.4) versus 2.7 (1.8-2.8) months, and median overall survival (secondary outcome) was 17.4 (14.1-20.3) versus 9.4 (7.5-10.6) months. Benefit with durvalumab-ceralasertib was consistent across known immunotherapy-refractory subgroups. In ATM-altered patients hypothesized to harbor vulnerability to ATR inhibition, objective response rate was 26.1% (6/23) and median progression-free survival/median overall survival were 8.4/22.8 months. Durvalumab-ceralasertib safety/tolerability profile was manageable. Biomarker analyses suggested that anti-PD-L1/ATR inhibition induced immune changes that reinvigorated antitumor immunity. Durvalumab-ceralasertib is under further investigation in immunotherapy-refractory NSCLC.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03334617.
Insights
The HUDSON study found that combining durvalumab with ceralasertib showed promising results for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who did not respond to prior immunotherapy. This combination demonstrated improved objective response rates and survival outcomes in refractory NSCLC patients.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Immunotherapy
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Standard immunotherapy (anti-PD-(L)1) offers limited durable benefit for many non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.
- Resistance to immune checkpoint blockade is a significant challenge, driven by factors like DNA damage repair defects and tumor microenvironment alterations.
- Novel therapeutic strategies are needed to overcome resistance and improve outcomes in advanced NSCLC.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate rational combination regimens in patients with advanced NSCLC who progressed on anti-PD-(L)1 immunotherapy and platinum-doublet therapy.
- To assess the efficacy and safety of durvalumab combined with ceralasertib, olaparib, danvatirsen, or oleclumab.
- To identify the most effective combination for immunotherapy-refractory NSCLC.
Main Methods:
- The phase 2 umbrella HUDSON study enrolled 268 patients with advanced NSCLC.
- Patients received durvalumab (anti-PD-L1) in combination with ceralasertib (ATR inhibitor), olaparib (PARP inhibitor), danvatirsen (STAT3 ASO), or oleclumab (anti-CD73).
- Objective response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival were key outcome measures.
Main Results:
- Durvalumab-ceralasertib demonstrated the greatest clinical benefit, with an objective response rate of 13.9% compared to 2.6% for other combinations.
- Median progression-free survival was 5.8 months for durvalumab-ceralasertib versus 2.7 months for others.
- Median overall survival was 17.4 months for durvalumab-ceralasertib versus 9.4 months for other regimens. ATM-altered patients showed a 26.1% objective response rate with this combination.
Conclusions:
- Durvalumab-ceralasertib represents a promising combination therapy for immunotherapy-refractory NSCLC.
- This combination demonstrated manageable safety and tolerability.
- Biomarker analyses suggest durvalumab-ceralasertib reinvigorates antitumor immunity, warranting further investigation.
More Related Videos
07:43Using 22C3 Anti-PD-L1 Antibody Concentrate on Biopsy and Cytology Samples from Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients
Published on: September 25, 2018
04:04Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Intratumoral Injection of Cisplatin for the Treatment of Isolated Mediastinal Recurrence of Lung Cancer
Published on: February 12, 2017